Literature DB >> 16154671

Feasibilty of in utero DNA vaccination following naked gene transfer into pig fetal muscle: transgene expression, immunity and safety.

Monica Rinaldi1, Emanuela Signori, Paolo Rosati, Giorgio Cannelli, Paola Parrella, Enrico Iannace, Giovanni Monego, Silvia Anna Ciafrè, Maria Giulia Farace, Sandra Iurescia, Daniela Fioretti, Guido Rasi, Vito Michele Fazio.   

Abstract

The high toll of death among first-week infants is due to infections occurring at the end of pregnancy, during birth or by breastfeeding. This problem significantly concerns industrialized countries also. To prevent the typical "first-week infections", a vaccine would be protective as early as at the birth. In utero DNA immunization has demonstrated the effectiveness in inducing specific immunity in newborns. We have already published results of a 2-year follow-up showing long-term safety, protective antibody titers at birth and long-term immune memory, following intramuscular in utero anti-HBV DNA immunization in 90-days pig fetuses. We have now analyzed further parameters of short-term safety. Two different reporter genes were injected in the thigh muscles of 90-days fetuses. At 8 days following DNA injection, we found high-level of transgenes expression in all injected fetuses. A step gradient of expression from the area of injection was observed with both reporter genes. CMV promoter/enhancer produced higher levels of expression compared to SV40 promoter/enhancer. Moreover, no evidence of local or systemic flogistic alterations or fetal malformations, mortality or haemorrhage following intramuscular injection were observed. A single anti-HBV s-antigen DNA immunization in 90-days fetuses supported protective antibody levels in all immunized newborns, lasting at least up to 4 months after birth. Our report further sustains safety and efficacy of intramuscular in utero naked gene transfer and immunization. This approach may support therapeutic or prophylactic procedure in many early life-threatening pathologic conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16154671     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.08.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  6 in total

Review 1.  DNA vaccines: developing new strategies against cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Fioretti; Sandra Iurescia; Vito Michele Fazio; Monica Rinaldi
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-03-28

2.  Maternal LAMP/p55gagHIV-1 DNA immunization induces in utero priming and a long-lasting immune response in vaccinated neonates.

Authors:  Paula Ordonhez Rigato; Milton Maciel; Adriana Letícia Goldoni; Orlando Guerra Piubelli; Noemia Mie Orii; Ernesto Torres Marques; Joseph Thomas August; Alberto José da Silva Duarte; Maria Notomi Sato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  DNA vaccine for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Benjamin Yang; Jessica Jeang; Andrew Yang; T C Wu; Chien-Fu Hung
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Transplacental Gene Delivery (TPGD) as a Noninvasive Tool for Fetal Gene Manipulation in Mice.

Authors:  Shingo Nakamura; Satoshi Watanabe; Naoko Ando; Masayuki Ishihara; Masahiro Sato
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Cytotoxic T Cell Responses Induced by CS1/CRT Fusion DNA Vaccine in a Human Plasmacytoma Model.

Authors:  Xueshi Ye; Wanli Li; Jinwen Huang; Lifei Zhang; Ye Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Nanoparticle cancer vaccines: Design considerations and recent advances.

Authors:  Jingjing Liu; Lei Miao; Jiying Sui; Yanyun Hao; Guihua Huang
Journal:  Asian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 6.598

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.