| Literature DB >> 16154367 |
D Marlier1, R Dewrée, C Lassence, D Licois, J Mainil, P Coudert, L Meulemans, R Ducatelle, H Vindevogel.
Abstract
Epizootic rabbit enteropathy (ERE), a highly lethal (30-80% mortality) disease of broiler rabbits aged 6-14 weeks, first appeared in 1997 in French intensive enclosed rabbitries and is of unknown aetiology. Bacteriological, virological and parasitical examination of the intestinal contents of rabbits that had died either in spontaneous field cases or after experimental reproduction of ERE, were undertaken in an attempt to identify infectious agents that may play a role in the disease. Two bacterial strains, Clostridium perfringens and non-enteropathogenic Escherichia coli were repeatedly isolated at high faecal counts from naturally infected animals. In field cases, a correlation between typical gross lesions of epizootic enteropathy and the presence of the alpha toxin of Cl. perfringens was observed (P<0.0001; Chi-squared test). Although attempts to reproduce the disease by inoculation with different pools of cultivable bacterial strains failed, the disease was successfully reproduced by inoculation with one French and two Belgian samples of caecal contents.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16154367 PMCID: PMC7110785 DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.07.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet J ISSN: 1090-0233 Impact factor: 2.688
Sequences of primers and PCR conditions for Cl. perfringens toxinotyping and E. coli eaeA gene amplification
| Gene | Primer sequences 5′-3′ | Optimal annealing temperature (°C) | Product size (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGCTAATGTTACTGCCGTTGATAGATAATCCCAATCATCCCAACTATG | 51.7 | 247 | ||
| GCGAATATGCTGAATCATCTAGCAGGAACATTAGTATATCTTC | 53 | 196 | ||
| TTTTAACTAGTTCATTTCCTAGTTATTTTTGTATTCTTTTTCTCTAGGATT | 46.2 | 298 | ||
| GAAAGGTAATGGAGAATTATCTTAATGCGCAGAATCAGGATTTTGACCATATAC | 48 | 573 | ||
| GCGGTGATATCCATCTATTCCCACTTACTTGTCCTACTAAC | 53 | 655 | ||
| AGGCTTCGTCACAGTTGCCATCGTCACCAGAGGA | 51.9 | 570 |
Histories, ages of affected animals and number of rabbits with ERE/number of necropsies in the eight rabbit farms
| Rabbitries | History | Age of the animals (weeks) | Number of rabbits with ERE/number of necropsies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mortality rate >50% | 6 | 3/3 |
| 2 | Digestive outbreaks just after the weaning | 6 | 1/1 |
| 3 | Mortality rate > 50% | 7 | 3/6 |
| 4 | Mortality rate > 50% | 6–11 | 4/6 |
| 5 | Mortality rate > 50% | 6–13 | 2/7 |
| 6 | Mortality rate < 50% | 9 | 1/1 |
| 7 | Digestive outbreaks just after the weaning | 8 | 1/1 |
| 8 | Digestive outbreaks just after the weaning | 8 | 3/3 |
Results of bacteriological examinations in aerobic and anaerobic conditions of mixed faecal samples (stomach, small intestine and cæcum) of 12 rabbits that had died of ERE (field samples)
| Bacterial strain | Number of positive examinations/total number of examinations |
|---|---|
| Enteropathogenic | 0/12 |
| 8/12 | |
| 3/12 | |
| No | 1/12 |
| 3/12 | |
| 3/12 | |
| 1/12 | |
| 1/12 | |
| 2/12 | |
| 10/12 | |
| 1/12 | |
| 1/12 | |
| 1/12 | |
| 2/12 | |
| 2/12 | |
| 1/12 | |
| 3/12 |
Both bio-serotyping and PCR amplification for the eaeA gene were negative.
Comparison of ERE clinical signs rates, mortality rates and mortality ranges after experimental reproduction of ERE in SPF rabbits inoculated with two Belgian and one French inoculum
| Inoculum (number of rabbits) | ERE | Mortality rate (%) | Mortality range in days |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controls 1 | 0 | 0 | – |
| B1 | 33 | 22 | 4–11 |
| TEC3 | 54 | 33 | 4–13 |
| Controls 2 | 0 | 0 | – |
| B2 | 87 | 16 | 4–11 |
| TEC3 | 100 | 24 | 3–25 |
Animals used in the B1 inoculation experimentation.
Animals used in the B2 inoculation experimentation.
Rambling noise and/or diarrhoea and/or stomach distension and/or intestinal distension were considered ERE clinical signs.
Mean daily weight gains (mean ± standard deviation) during experimental reproduction of ERE in SPF rabbits inoculated with two Belgian (B1 and B2) and one French (Tec3) inoculum
| Days after inoculation | Control group B1 experimentation | Rabbits inoculated with B1 | Rabbits inoculated with TEC3 | Control group B2 experimentation | Rabbits inoculated with B2 | Rabbits inoculated with TEC3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–3 | 43 ± 6.5 ( | 22 ± 13 | 8.3 ± 18 | 34 ± 8.0 ( | 26 ± 14 | 16 ± 9.6 |
| 3–6 | 46 ± 5.2 ( | 24 ± 23 | 19 ± 17 | 45 ± 5.2 ( | 21 ± 23 | 9.2 ± 16 |
| 6–10 | 45 ± 5.6 ( | 23 ± 18 | 30 ± 17 | 45 ± 4.8 ( | 25 ± 22 | 24 ± 23 |
| 10–13 (B1) 10–14 (B2) | 43 ± 6.5 ( | 39 ± 9.9 ( | 22 ± 25 | 47 ± 8.7 ( | 41 ± 10 ( | 32 ± 14 |
n = number of data.
Significantly different from the respective control group (P < 0.05) by the Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric ANOVA test and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test.