Literature DB >> 16154124

Combined expectancy effects: an accumulator model.

Uwe Mattler1.   

Abstract

When participants use cues to prepare for a likely stimulus or a likely response, reaction times are facilitated by valid cues but prolonged by invalid cues. In studies on combined expectancy effects, two cues give information regarding two dimensions of the forthcoming task. When the two cues consist of two separable stimuli their effects are approximately additive. When cues are presented as an integrated stimulus, cueing effects interact. A model is presented that simulates effects like these. The model assumes that cues affect different processing stages. When implicit information suggests that expectancies are unrelated, as for instance with separated cues, cueing effects at early and late levels of processing remain independent. When implicit information suggests that expectancies are related, as with integrated cues, however, a mechanism that is sensitive to the validity of the early stage cue, leads to an adjustment of the cueing effect at the late stage. The model is based on neurophysiologically plausible assumptions, it is given explicitly in mathematical terms, and it provides a good fit to a large body of empirical data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16154124     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  2 in total

1.  Tied to expectations: Predicting features speeds processing even under adverse circumstances.

Authors:  Sabine Schwager; Robert Gaschler; Dennis Rünger; Peter A Frensch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-05

2.  Combined expectancies: electrophysiological evidence for the adjustment of expectancy effects.

Authors:  Uwe Mattler; Arie van der Lugt; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 3.288

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.