Literature DB >> 16153916

Who would be a candidate for bridge to recovery during prolonged mechanical left ventricular support in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?

Goro Matsumiya1, Osamu Monta, Norihide Fukushima, Yoshiki Sawa, Toshihiro Funatsu, Kouichi Toda, Hikaru Matsuda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to elucidate the incidence and timing of myocardial recovery in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy during prolonged support with a left ventricular assist system and to characterize the factors influencing this phenomenon.
METHODS: Since 2000, 11 patients (mean age, 27.9 years) with end-stage heart failure caused by dilated cardiomyopathy were supported with a left ventricular assist system for more than 6 months. All patients had aggressive pharmacologic treatment, including beta-blockers, together with unloading by means of a left ventricular assist system.
RESULTS: During 239 to 663 days (mean, 453 days) of left ventricular assist system support, 5 patients had significant recovery of cardiac function and successfully underwent left ventricular assist system removal. All of these patients have remained in New York Heart Association class 1 during 8 to 29 months of follow-up. The improvement of left ventricular function started at various times. In particular, 2 of 5 recovered patients started to show improvement after 1 year of left ventricular assist system support. The myocardial fibrosis did not resolve but rather worsened in all patients during left ventricular assist system support. However, myocardial fibrosis was less severe in the recovered group (17.7% +/- 8.2% at left ventricular assist system implantation vs 20.1% +/- 5.2% at explantation) in comparison with that in the nonrecovered group (30.5% +/- 13.2% vs 48.4% +/- 5.1%) both before and after use of the left ventricular assist system.
CONCLUSION: Patients with severe congestive heart failure caused by dilated cardiomyopathy have a good chance of myocardial recovery and successful explantation of the left ventricular assist system. A relatively slow response of myocardial recovery during prolonged left ventricular assist system support was demonstrated in some patients. A lesser degree of fibrotic changes in the left ventricle was predictive of recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16153916     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  21 in total

Review 1.  Is myocardial recovery possible and how do you measure it?

Authors:  Douglas L Mann; Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Reverse cardiac remodeling enabled by mechanical unloading of the left ventricle.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Malliaras; John V Terrovitis; Stavros G Drakos; John N Nanas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Bridge to recovery: understanding the disconnect between clinical and biological outcomes.

Authors:  Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Josef Stehlik; Craig H Selzman; Bruce B Reid; John V Terrovitis; John N Nanas; Dean Y Li
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  A novel system of assessing myocardial recovery during left ventricular support: report of a case.

Authors:  Takaya Hoashi; Goro Matsumiya; Yasushi Sakata; Shigetoyo Kogaki; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Current status of extracorporeal ventricular assist devices in Japan.

Authors:  Takashi Nishimura
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 6.  Building a bridge to recovery: the pathophysiology of LVAD-induced reverse modeling in heart failure.

Authors:  Shigeru Miyagawa; Koichi Toda; Teruya Nakamura; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Satsuki Fukushima; Shunsuke Saito; Daisuke Yoshioka; Tetsuya Saito; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Hemodynamic changes during left ventricular assist device-off test correlate with the degree of cardiac fibrosis and predict the outcome after device explantation.

Authors:  Shunsuke Saito; Koichi Toda; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Satsuki Fukushima; Yasushi Sakata; Isamu Mizote; Takashi Daimon; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 1.731

8.  Initial report of bridge to recovery in a patient with DuraHeart LVAD.

Authors:  Daisuke Yoshioka; Koichi Toda; Taichi Sakaguchi; Shigeru Miyagawa; Hiroyuki Nishi; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Satsuki Fukushima; Shunsuke Saito; Tetsuya Saito; Ikuko Shibasaki; Yasushi Sakata; Tomohito Ohtani; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 1.731

9.  Preoperative beta-blocker treatment is a key for deciding left ventricular assist device implantation strategy as a bridge to recovery.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Koichiro Kinugawa; Masaru Hatano; Takeo Fujino; Hironori Muraoka; Toshiro Inaba; Hisataka Maki; Yukie Kagami; Miyoko Endo; Osamu Kinoshita; Kan Nawata; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 1.731

10.  Dynamic expression profiles of MMPs/TIMPs and collagen deposition in mechanically unloaded rat heart: implications for left ventricular assist device support-induced cardiac alterations.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Yu-Xian Xu; Xiao-Jie Du; Quan-Ge Sun; Ying-Jun Tian
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.158

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.