Literature DB >> 16153819

Multivariate prognostic evaluation of the mitotic activity index and fibrotic focus in node-negative invasive breast cancers.

Jan P A Baak1, Cecile G A Colpaert, Paul J van Diest, Emiel Janssen, Bianca van Diermen, Eliza Albernaz, Peter B Vermeulen, Eric A Van Marck.   

Abstract

We validated with univariate and multivariate (Cox) analysis, the prognostic value of the mitotic activity index (MAI), the fibrotic focus (FF) and other prognosticators in 448 patients with lymph node-negative (LN-) invasive breast cancer <55 years without adjuvant systemic treatment (72.5 months median follow-up, range 4-119). Of these patients, 24.8% developed distant and 1.6% loco-regional recurrence. FF showed excellent inter-observer reproducibility (kappa = 0.93). Strong prognosticators were MAI, grade, nuclear atypia, FF and the St. Gallen criterion (SG). The subgroup with excellent survival selected by SG was only 16% of all patients, implying over-treatment of more than 70% of all LN- patients when using SG as adjuvant therapy selection criterion. If MAI <10, 13% showed distant metastases, contrasting with 41% if MAI > or = 10. FF was prognostic in the ductal and mixed ductal cancers, but not in the lobular and other subtype cancers. Patients with invasive (mixed) ductal cancers with FF absent, FF < 1/3 or FF > 1/3 of the tumour area, had distant metastasis rates of 17%, 35% and 48%; in MAI < 10 and FF absent, FF < 1/3 or FF > 1/3, metastasis rates were 11%, 13% and 42% and if MAI > or = 10, metastasis rates were 31%, 48% and 50%, respectively. In the 12 patients with MAI < 10 and a large FF > 1/3, event-free survival was similar to patients with MAI > or = 10. With multiple regression MAI < 10 versus > or = 10 is the strongest prognosticator (also stronger than the SG). The FF may be important as it has additional prognostic value to the MAI in the small subgroup of invasive ductal or mixed-ductal breast cancer patients with combined MAI < 10 and an FF > 1/3 of the tumour area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16153819     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  8 in total

Review 1.  Tumour-microenvironment interactions: role of tumour stroma and proteins produced by cancer-associated fibroblasts in chemotherapy response.

Authors:  Matthew David Hale; Jeremy David Hayden; Heike Irmgard Grabsch
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 6.730

2.  The prognostic significance of tumor-associated stroma in invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Soomin Ahn; Junhun Cho; Jiyoun Sung; Jeong Eon Lee; Seok Jin Nam; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Eun Yoon Cho
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-05-13

3.  An absence of stromal caveolin-1 expression predicts early tumor recurrence and poor clinical outcome in human breast cancers.

Authors:  Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Abhijit Dasgupta; Federica Sotgia; Isabelle Mercier; Richard G Pestell; Michael Sabel; Celina G Kleer; Jonathan R Brody; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Modified primary tumour/vessel tumour/nodal tumour classification for patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  T Hasebe; M Iwasaki; S Akashi-Tanaka; T Hojo; T Shibata; Y Sasajima; T Kinoshita; H Tsuda
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Lymph node status as a guide to selection of available prognostic markers in breast cancer: the clinical practice of the future?

Authors:  A Elzagheid; T Kuopio; S Pyrhönen; Y Collan
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 2.644

6.  Amplified centrosomes and mitotic index display poor concordance between patient tumors and cultured cancer cells.

Authors:  Karuna Mittal; Da Hoon Choi; Angela Ogden; Shashi Donthamsetty; Brian D Melton; Meenakshi V Gupta; Vaishali Pannu; Guilherme Cantuaria; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Michelle D Reid; Kristin Jonsdottir; Emiel A M Janssen; Mohammad A Aleskandarany; Ian O Ellis; Emad A Rakha; Padmashree C G Rida; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Association between the degree of fibrosis in fibrotic focus and the unfavorable clinicopathological prognostic features of breast cancer.

Authors:  Yongfu Li; Yuhan Wei; Wenjun Tang; Jingru Luo; Minghua Wang; Haifeng Lin; Hong Guo; Yuling Ma; Jun Zhang; Qin Li
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Tumor budding and fibrotic focus-proposed grading system for tumor budding in invasive carcinoma no special type of the breast.

Authors:  Miyuki Hiratsuka; Takahiro Hasebe; Toshiaki Saeki; Yuki Ichinose; Ayaka Sakakibara; Akihiro Fujimoto; Noriko Wakui; Satomi Shibasaki; Masataka Hirasaki; Masanori Yasuda; Akemi Nukui; Hiroko Shimada; Hideki Yokogawa; Kazuo Matsuura; Takashi Hojo; Akihiko Osaki
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.535

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.