Literature DB >> 16153768

Guidelines for the uniform reporting of data for Medical Emergency Teams.

Michelle Cretikos1, Michael Parr, Ken Hillman, Gillian Bishop, Daniel Brown, Kathy Daffurn, Hanh Dinh, Nevenka Francis, Tracy Heath, Grant Hill, Jeff Murphy, David Sanchez, Nancy Santiano, Lis Young.   

Abstract

It is more than 15 years since the first Medical Emergency Team (MET) system was introduced to identify patients at risk and prevent serious adverse events in Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Since then the MET system has been introduced to many other hospitals in Australia and around the world. Standardised and complete reporting of data related to MET activity is increasingly important to identify the role and benefits of the system and to facilitate quality improvement in health care in general. A uniform method for reporting data related to MET activity will aid interpretation of results, comparisons, review and changes to the MET system. The guidelines for uniform reporting of data in relation to MET activities used in our group of hospitals are presented. Future refinement and consensus agreement on the reporting of MET data internationally should enable comparisons between MET systems in several countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16153768     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  8 in total

1.  The deteriorating ward patient: a Swedish-Australian comparison.

Authors:  Gabriella Jäderling; Paolo Calzavacca; Max Bell; Claes-Roland Martling; Daryl Jones; Rinaldo Bellomo; David Konrad
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  [Analysis of response reports of an in-hospital emergency team : Three years experience at a maximum medical care hospital].

Authors:  M Kumpch; T Luiz; C Madler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Benchmarking the use of a rapid response team by surgical services at a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Daniel A Barocas; Chirag S Kulahalli; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; April N Kapu; David F Penson; Chaochen Chad You; Lisa Weavind; Roger Dmochowski
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Risk assessment in the first fifteen minutes: a prospective cohort study of a simple physiological scoring system in the emergency department.

Authors:  Tobias M Merz; Reto Etter; Ludger Mende; Daniel Barthelmes; Jan Wiegand; Luca Martinolli; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Development of a tool for defining and identifying the dying patient in hospital: Criteria for Screening and Triaging to Appropriate aLternative care (CriSTAL).

Authors:  Magnolia Cardona-Morrell; Ken Hillman
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.568

6.  Risk factors associated with short term mortality changes over time, after arrival to the emergency department.

Authors:  Camilla Nørgaard Bech; Mikkel Brabrand; Søren Mikkelsen; Annmarie Lassen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Effect of National Early Warning Scoring System Implementation on Cardiopulmonary Arrest, Unplanned ICU Admission, Emergency Surgery, and Acute Kidney Injury in an Emergency Hospital, Egypt.

Authors:  Mohamed Naeem Badr; Nahla Shaaban Khalil; Ahmed Mohamed Mukhtar
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-06-15

8.  Rapid response system in Japanese outpatient departments based on online registry: Multicentre observational study.

Authors:  Takeshi Aoyama; Isao Tsuneyoshi; Takanao Otake; Kazuo Ouchi; Yuta Kawase; Masayasu Arai; Naoaki Shibata; Shinsuke Fujiwara; Shigeki Fujitani
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-01-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.