Literature DB >> 16153678

Exogenous attentional selection of transparent superimposed surfaces modulates early event-related potentials.

W Khoe1, J F Mitchell, J H Reynolds, S A Hillyard.   

Abstract

Using a transparent motion paradigm, [Valdes-Sosa, M., Bobes, M. A., Rodriguez, V., & Pinilla, T. (1998). Switching attention without shifting the spotlight object-based attentional modulation of brain potentials, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 137-151; Valdes-Sosa, M., Cobo, A., & Pinilla, T. (2000). Attention to object files defined by transparent motion, Journal of Experimental Psychological: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 488-505] found that when attention is endogenously directed to one surface, observers can more reliably report the direction of a brief translation of the cued than the uncued surface. Using a similar design [Reynolds, J. H., Alborzian, S., & Stoner, G. R. (2003). Exogenously cued attention triggers competitive selection of surfaces, Vision Research, 43, 59-66] found that even in the absence of an endogenous cue, the first translation acted as a potent exogenous cue that impaired the observer's ability to discriminate a subsequent translation of the other surface. We investigated the neural basis of this exogenous cueing effect by recording visual event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by translations of the cued and uncued surfaces. Subjects were given the task of judging whether or not the first and second translations were identical in direction, and their performance was impaired when the second translation occurred on the uncued, as compared to the cued surface. The posterior C1 (75-110 ms) and N1 (160-210 ms) components of the ERP elicited by the second translation of the cued surface were larger than those elicited by translation of the uncued surface. These behavioral and ERP cueing effects were present even when the two surfaces were identical in color and thus could not be attributed to attention-related modulations of the gain of color channels. These findings provide evidence that exogenous cueing results in preferential selection of the cued surface at both early and intermediate stages of visual-cortical processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16153678     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  23 in total

1.  Stimulus-specific competitive selection in macaque extrastriate visual area V4.

Authors:  Mazyar Fallah; Gene R Stoner; John H Reynolds
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Endogenous attention selection during binocular rivalry at early stages of visual processing.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Effects of attentional load on early visual processing depend on stimulus timing.

Authors:  Karsten Rauss; Gilles Pourtois; Patrik Vuilleumier; Sophie Schwartz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Magnocellular and parvocellular influences on reflexive attention.

Authors:  Anthony J Ries; Joseph B Hopfinger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Dissociation of visual C1 and P1 components as a function of attentional load: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Shimin Fu; John R Fedota; Pamela M Greenwood; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  Intermodal auditory, visual, and tactile attention modulates early stages of neural processing.

Authors:  Christina M Karns; Robert T Knight
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  The normalization model of attention.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; David J Heeger
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Electrophysiological correlates of learning-induced modulation of visual motion processing in humans.

Authors:  Viktor Gál; István Kóbor; Eva M Bankó; Lajos R Kozák; John T Serences; Zoltán Vidnyánszky
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Electrical neuroimaging evidence that spatial frequency-based selective attention affects V1 activity as early as 40-60 ms in humans.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Marzia Del Zotto; Alberto Zani
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Exploring the mechanisms underlying surface-based stimulus selection.

Authors:  Gene R Stoner; Georgina Blanc
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.