Literature DB >> 16153557

Adverse reactions to ultrasound contrast agents: is the risk worth the benefit?

P A Dijkmans1, C A Visser, O Kamp.   

Abstract

The introduction of ultrasound contrast agents has led to a marked improvement in diagnostic capabilities in echocardiography. As no serious adverse events were seen during the preclinical development phase, ultrasound contrast agents were thought to be safe. Recently, three fatal and 19 severe, non-fatal adverse reactions were reported in a post marketing analysis of more than 150,000 studies of Sonovue, which has led to the addition of several contra-indications for the use of this ultrasound contrast agent. Although a strong relationship was established between the non-fatal cases and administration of Sonovue, a causal relationship between the fatal cases and the use of Sonovue is debatable. Therefore, the risk associated with the use of this ultrasound contrast agent should be judged carefully, taking into consideration the prevalence of adverse effects of other contrast media and diagnostic procedures used in cardiology.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16153557     DOI: 10.1016/j.euje.2005.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr        ISSN: 1532-2114


  13 in total

1.  Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Clinical uses of microbubbles in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  David Cosgrove; Chris Harvey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound mapping of sentinel lymph nodes in oral tongue cancer-a pilot study.

Authors:  Shalva R Gvetadze; Ping Xiong; Mingming Lv; Jun Li; Jingzhou Hu; Konstantin D Ilkaev; Xin Yang; Jian Sun
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Measurement of coronary flow reserve by noninvasive cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Alberto Cuocolo; Mario Petretta; Andrea Soricelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Imaging Modalities for Assessment of Treatment Response to Nonsurgical Hepatocellular Carcinoma Therapy: Contrast-Enhanced US, CT, and MRI.

Authors:  Yasunori Minami; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 11.740

6.  Sentinel lymph node metastasis diagnosis using ultrasound plus magnetic resonance lymphangiography in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yishan He; Oufei Liu; Jing Su; Qing Hong; Mengquan Li
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-06

7.  Is Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Superior to Computed Tomography for Differential Diagnosis of Gallbladder Polyps? A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Zhiqing Yuan; Xuesong Liu; Qiwei Li; Yunhe Zhang; Ling Zhao; Fenghua Li; Tao Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Microbubbles and UltraSound-accelerated Thrombolysis (MUST) for peripheral arterial occlusions: protocol for a phase II single-arm trial.

Authors:  Harm P Ebben; Johanna H Nederhoed; Rutger J Lely; Willem Wisselink; Kakkhee Yeung
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Coronary microvascular resistance: methods for its quantification in humans.

Authors:  Paul Knaapen; Paolo G Camici; Koen M Marques; Robin Nijveldt; Jeroen J Bax; Nico Westerhof; Marco J W Götte; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Heinrich R Schelbert; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 17.165

10.  Intradermal microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a feasible approach for sentinel lymph node identification in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Fei Xie; Dongjie Zhang; Lin Cheng; Lei Yu; Li Yang; Fuzhong Tong; Hongjun Liu; Shu Wang; Shan Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.