Literature DB >> 16153490

When continuous surgical site infection surveillance is interrupted: the Royal Hobart Hospital experience.

Pamela K Sykes1, Robert K Brodribb, Mary-Louise McLaws, Alistair McGregor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of surgical site infections (SSI) is second only to urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients. They continue to threaten the health of hospitalized patients and impact negatively on the financial solvency of hospitals through prolonged hospitalization, increased rates of rehospitalization, and significantly increased health care costs.
METHODS: We describe the effect of a 12-year surveillance program that included postdischarge follow-up and feedback to clinicians on the rate of SSI and the effect when surveillance is interrupted. Surgical procedures performed at the Royal Hobart Hospital (RHH), a university teaching hospital in Australia, between 1988 and 2001 were monitored for evidence of SSI in hospitals and for up to 30 days postoperatively. The surveillance program was inadvertently disrupted for 15 months from October 1990 to January 1992 and then recommenced. It has been ongoing since that time, apart from a 3-month interruption in 1998. Infection rates were determined on a regular basis, and these results were provided to surgeons, theatre staff, and surgical ward staff every 6 months. Patients included all adult surgical patients with an incisional wound, excluding burn patients and day-only surgical patients.
RESULTS: Over the 12-year active surveillance period, 47,581 surgical procedures were followed for SSI. In-hospital SSI rates declined significantly over the study period from 4.7% (95% CI: 3.9%-5.6%) in 1988-1989 to 1.2% (95% CI: 0.8%-1.7%) in 2001 (P < .0001). Infection rates fell rapidly following the commencement of the program. This decline was halted during the period from October 1990 to January 1992 when the program was suspended. In-hospital SSI rates declined once again following the recommencement of the surveillance program, and these lower rates have been maintained. In contrast, postdischarge infection rates rose significantly from 1.2% (95% CI: 0.8%-1.7%) in 1988-1989 to 2.1% (95% CI: 1.6%-2.7%) in 2001 (P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: The introduction of a program of continuous SSI surveillance at the RHH was associated with a reduction in the in-hospital and total SSI rate. This phenomenon was repeated following the recommencement of the program after a temporary interruption. Increasing numbers of SSIs are arising after hospital discharge. Many of these patients are readmitted to the hospital for further management of the SSI. Surveillance programs that do not perform postdischarge surveillance will have difficulty in capturing this data. Our experience supports the Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control (SENIC) findings, showing that health care facilities can achieve improved levels of infection management with active surveillance programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16153490     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.04.244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  8 in total

1.  Right colon, left colon, and rectal surgeries are not similar for surgical site infection development. Analysis of 277 elective and urgent colorectal resections.

Authors:  Luca Degrate; Mattia Garancini; Marta Misani; Silvia Poli; Cinzia Nobili; Fabrizio Romano; Laura Giordano; Vittorio Motta; Franco Uggeri
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Factors influencing antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical site infection prevention in general surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Anna R Gagliardi; Darlene Fenech; Cagla Eskicioglu; Avery B Nathens; Robin McLeod
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  [Responsibility of surgeons for surgical site infections].

Authors:  P Gastmeier; C Brandt; D Sohr; H Rüden
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  A Roadmap for Reducing Cardiac Device Infections: a Review of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Actionable Risk Factors to Guide the Development of an Infection Prevention Program for the Electrophysiology Laboratory.

Authors:  Westyn Branch-Elliman
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  Continuous follow-up of surgical site infections for 30 days after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Minako Kobayashi; Yasuhiko Mohri; Yasuhiro Inoue; Yoshiki Okita; Chikao Miki; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis use in elective orthopaedic surgery - a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Felix Rohrer; Anita Maurer; Hubert Noetzli; Brigitta Gahl; Andreas Limacher; Tanja Hermann; Jan Bruegger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Description of a multidisciplinary initiative to improve SCIP measures related to pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis compliance: a single-center success story.

Authors:  Tori Sutherland; Jennifer Beloff; Marie Lightowler; Xiaoxia Liu; Luigino Nascimben; Alan D Kaye; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2014-09-17

8.  Use of Feedback Data to Reduce Surgical Site Infections and Optimize Antibiotic Use in Surgery: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Shalini Ahuja; Nathan Peiffer-Smadja; Kimberly Peven; Michelle White; Andrew J M Leather; Sanjeev Singh; Marc Mendelson; Alison Holmes; Gabriel Birgand; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 13.787

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.