Literature DB >> 16153044

A biogeographic pattern in sparrow bill morphology: parallel adaptation to tidal marshes.

J Letitia Grenier1, Russell Greenberg.   

Abstract

The study of ecological convergence, the evolution of similar traits on multiple occasions in response to similar conditions, is a powerful method for developing and testing adaptive hypotheses. However, despite the great attention paid to geographic variation and the foraging ecology of birds, surprisingly few cases of convergent or parallel feeding adaptations have been adequately documented. In this study, we document a biogeographic pattern of parallel bill morphology across 10 sparrow taxa endemic to tidal marshes. All North American tidal marsh sparrows display parallel differentiation from close relatives in other habitats, suggesting that selection on bill morphology is strong. Relative to their body mass, tidal marsh sparrows have longer, thinner bills than their non-tidal marsh counterparts, which is likely an adaptation for consuming more invertebrates and fewer seeds, as well as for probing in sediment crevices to capture prey. Published data on tidal marsh food resources and diet of the relevant taxa support this hypothesis. This morphological differentiation is most pronounced between sister taxa with the greatest estimated divergence times, but is found even in taxa that show little or no structure in molecular genetic markers. We, therefore, speculate that tidal marsh ecosystems are likely settings for ecological speciation.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16153044     DOI: 10.1554/04-502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

1.  Common garden experiment reveals genetic control of phenotypic divergence between swamp sparrow subspecies that lack divergence in neutral genotypes.

Authors:  Barbara Ballentine; Russell Greenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Variation in the structure of bird nests between northern Manitoba and southeastern Ontario.

Authors:  Carla A Crossman; Vanya G Rohwer; Paul R Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Habitat type and ambient temperature contribute to bill morphology.

Authors:  David Luther; Russell Greenberg
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Do foraging methods in winter affect morphology during growth in juvenile snow geese?

Authors:  Jón Einar Jónsson; Alan D Afton
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Divergent selection and drift shape the genomes of two avian sister species spanning a saline-freshwater ecotone.

Authors:  Jennifer Walsh; Gemma V Clucas; Matthew D MacManes; W Kelley Thomas; Adrienne I Kovach
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  The influence of spatially heterogeneous anthropogenic change on bill size evolution in a coastal songbird.

Authors:  Phred M Benham; Rauri C K Bowie
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Stable isotope mixing models demonstrate the role of an invasive plant in wetland songbird food webs.

Authors:  Rachel D Wigginton; Chloe Van Grootheest; Hildie Spautz; J Letitia Grenier; Christine R Whitcraft
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 2.511

8.  Heat loss may explain bill size differences between birds occupying different habitats.

Authors:  Russell Greenberg; Viviana Cadena; Raymond M Danner; Glenn J Tattersall; Glenn Tattersall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Inter- and intraspecific genetic and morphological variation in a sibling pair of carabid species.

Authors:  Hilde Dhuyvetter; Jean-Pierre Maelfait; Konjev Desender
Journal:  Saline Systems       Date:  2007-04-24

10.  Evolution of body morphology and beak shape revealed by a morphometric analysis of 14 Paridae species.

Authors:  Shimiao Shao; Qing Quan; Tianlong Cai; Gang Song; Yanhua Qu; Fumin Lei
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.172

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.