Literature DB >> 16151611

Assessing potential exposure of birds to pesticide-treated seeds.

Phil Prosser1, A D M Hart.   

Abstract

Seed treatments are widely used for crop protection and present a particular risk to granivorous birds. UK risk assessment for seed treatments has tended to focus on highly granivorous species; however, under some conditions, non-granivorous birds will take seeds. Better data is needed on which species eat seeds for which pesticide treatments are used. To identify which species will take and eat a range of crop seeds in common usage in the UK, birds visiting bait stations at which untreated seed was presented were video recorded. Information was also obtained on how much seed is taken by individual birds. The seeds tested were wheat, barley, maize, oilseed rape, grass, peas and pelleted sugar beet. For many of the species observed at the bait stations, the amounts of seed consumed during single visits were sufficient to pose a potential risk (toxicity-exposure ratio < 10) if the seed had been treated with one of the more acutely toxic seed treatments. Previous studies have shown that de-husking of seeds can substantially reduce birds' exposure. This paper provides information on which of the species recorded de-husked which seeds, in field conditions. The use of these data in pesticide risk assessment is considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16151611     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-005-0018-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  2 in total

Review 1.  Energetics of free-ranging mammals, reptiles, and birds.

Authors:  K A Nagy; I A Girard; T K Brown
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 11.848

2.  Hazards to wintering geese and other wildlife from the use of dieldrin, chlorfenvinphos and carbophenothion as wheat seed treatments.

Authors:  P I Stanley; P J Bunyan
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-07-18
  2 in total
  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of neurobehavioral abnormalities and immunotoxicity in response to oral imidacloprid exposure in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus).

Authors:  Dana Franzen-Klein; Mark Jankowski; Charlotte L Roy; Hoa Nguyen-Phuc; Da Chen; Lorin Neuman-Lee; Patrick Redig; Julia Ponder
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2020-02-05

2.  Exposure reduction of seed treatments through dehusking behaviour of the wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus).

Authors:  Carsten Albrecht Brühl; Bernd Guckenmus; Markus Ebeling; Ralf Barfknecht
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Diet of Mesozoic toothed birds (Longipterygidae) inferred from quantitative analysis of extant avian diet proxies.

Authors:  Case Vincent Miller; Michael Pittman; Xiaoli Wang; Xiaoting Zheng; Jen A Bright
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 7.364

4.  Neurological alterations induced by formulated imidacloprid toxicity in Japanese quails.

Authors:  Sayed M Rawi; Ayed S Al-Logmani; Reham Z Hamza
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.584

5.  A transgenic approach to control hemipteran insects by expressing insecticidal genes under phloem-specific promoters.

Authors:  Shaista Javaid; Imran Amin; Georg Jander; Zahid Mukhtar; Nasir A Saeed; Shahid Mansoor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Field evidence of bird poisonings by imidacloprid-treated seeds: a review of incidents reported by the French SAGIR network from 1995 to 2014.

Authors:  Florian Millot; Anouk Decors; Olivier Mastain; Thomas Quintaine; Philippe Berny; Danièle Vey; Romain Lasseur; Elisabeth Bro
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Using long-term datasets to assess the impacts of dietary exposure to neonicotinoids on farmland bird populations in England.

Authors:  Rosie J Lennon; Nick J B Isaac; Richard F Shore; Will J Peach; Jenny C Dunn; M Glória Pereira; Kathryn E Arnold; David Garthwaite; Colin D Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A review of the direct and indirect effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on vertebrate wildlife.

Authors:  David Gibbons; Christy Morrissey; Pierre Mineau
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.