Literature DB >> 1615125

Behavioral microanalysis of spatial delayed alternation performance: rehearsal through overt behavior, and effects of scopolamine and chlordiazepoxide.

P Dudchenko1, M Sarter.   

Abstract

Rats were trained in an operant spatial delayed alternation task utilizing retention intervals from 2 to 32 s. In addition to response accuracy, operations of the levers during the retention intervals were recorded and analyzed. Animals were tested following the administration of the muscarinic antagonists scopolamine hydrobromide and methylbromide, and the benzodiazepine receptor agonist chlordiazepoxide. In vehicle-treated animals, the relative number of correct responses and correct rehearsal operations (operation of the forthcoming correct lever during retention intervals) varied with the length of the retention intervals, and these measures were correlated. The response rate for rehearsal operations increased with the length of the retention intervals. It is speculated that the delay-dependent increase in response rate reflects an effect of delayed reward that was also associated with a delay-dependent increase in the tendency to alternate between levers. The effects of delay on the accuracy of rehearsal operations may have contributed to the delay-dependent correct responding. Scopolamine hydrobromide (0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3 mg/kg) and methylbromide (0.1, 0.3 mg/kg) impaired correct responding, but did not seem to interfere with the relative number of correct rehearsal operations. As only the presentation of the panel light indicated trial onset, it is speculated that the cholinergic receptor blockade resulted in an increase in the probability of a repositioning response that was triggered by light onset. Chlordiazepoxide (1, 3, 5, 10 mg/kg) did not affect behavioral performance. These results suggest that in tasks that allow the development of rehearsal operations, delay-dependent response accuracy does not represent a sufficient condition for conclusions on task demands on memory.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1615125     DOI: 10.1007/bf02245146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  49 in total

1.  Contrasting baseline-dependent effects of amphetamine, chlorpromazine and scopolamine on response switching in the pigeon.

Authors:  J L Evenden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Assessment of working memory in rats using spatial alternation behavior with variable retention intervals: effects of fixed-ratio size and scopolamine.

Authors:  H E Shannon; K G Bemis; J C Hart
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  The effects of scopolamine hydrobromide on one-way and two-way avoidance learning in rats.

Authors:  E Suits; R L Isaacson
Journal:  Int J Neuropharmacol       Date:  1968-09

4.  The effect of pre- and post-trial amphetamine injections on avoidance responses of rats.

Authors:  A M Evangelista; I Izquierdo
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1971

5.  Inhibitory and disinhibitory effects of nitrazepam, diazepam and flurazepam hydrochloride on delayed matching behaviour in monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  A N Nicholson; C M Wright
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  The effects of chlordiazepoxide on a delayed pair comparison task in pigeons.

Authors:  A Sahgal; S D Iversen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-09-15       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Scopolamine differentially disrupts the behavior of male and female Wistar rats in a delayed nonmatching to position procedure.

Authors:  A van Hest; J Stroet; F van Haaren; M Feenstra
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Low dose scopolamine affects discriminability but not rate of forgetting in delayed conditional discrimination.

Authors:  R C Kirk; K G White; N McNaughton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  The effects of scopolamine and methylscopolamine on visual and auditory discriminations in male and female Wistar rats.

Authors:  F van Haaren; A van Hest
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Scopolamine degrades spatial working memory but spares spatial reference memory: dissimilarity of anticholinergic effect and restriction of distal visual cues.

Authors:  W W Beatty; R A Bierley
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Central versus peripheral effects of muscarinic antagonists: the limitations of quaternary ammonium derivatives.

Authors:  H Moore; P Dudchenko; K S Comer; J P Bruno; M Sarter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Behavioral screening for cognition enhancers: from indiscriminate to valid testing: Part II.

Authors:  M Sarter; J Hagan; P Dudchenko
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Dissociation between cognitive and motor/motivational deficits in the delayed matching to position test: effects of scopolamine, 8-OH-DPAT and EAA antagonists.

Authors:  K J Stanhope; A P McLenachan; C T Dourish
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Automatic recording of mediating behavior in delayed matching- and nonmatching-to-position procedures in rats.

Authors:  Leigh V Panlilio; Sevil Yasar; Eric B Thorndike; Steven R Goldberg; Charles W Schindler
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Attenuation of muscarinic receptor blockade-induced impairment of spatial delayed alternation performance by the triazole MDL 26,479.

Authors:  L A Holley; P Dudchenko; M Sarter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  The touchscreen operant platform for testing working memory and pattern separation in rats and mice.

Authors:  Charlotte A Oomen; Martha Hvoslef-Eide; Christopher J Heath; Adam C Mar; Alexa E Horner; Timothy J Bussey; Lisa M Saksida
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  A novel 2- and 3-choice touchscreen-based continuous trial-unique nonmatching-to-location task (cTUNL) sensitive to functional differences between dentate gyrus and CA3 subregions of the hippocampus.

Authors:  C A Oomen; M Hvoslef-Eide; D Kofink; F Preusser; A C Mar; L M Saksida; T J Bussey
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.530

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.