Literature DB >> 16151184

Differences in genome size between closely related species: the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.

Matthieu Boulesteix1, Michèle Weiss, Christian Biémont.   

Abstract

Genome size varies considerably among organisms due to differences in the amplification, deletion, and divergence of various kinds of repetitive sequences, including the transposable elements, which constitute a large fraction of the genome. However, while the changes in genome size observed at a wide taxonomic level have been thoroughly investigated, we still know little about the process involved in closely related species. We estimated genome sizes and the reverse transcriptase-related sequence (RTRS) content in the nine species of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. We showed that the species differ with regard to their genome size and that the RTRS content is correlated with genome size for all species except Drosophila orena. The genome of D. orena, which is 1.6-fold as big as that of D. melanogaster, has in fact not undergone any major increase in its RTRS content.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16151184     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  20 in total

Review 1.  DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Cédric Feschotte; Ellen J Pritham
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Evolutionary pathways of the tirant LTR retrotransposon in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup of species.

Authors:  Marie Fablet; Sémi Souames; Christian Biémont; Cristina Vieira
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Hawaiian Drosophila genomes: size variation and evolutionary expansions.

Authors:  Elysse M Craddock; Joseph G Gall; Mark Jonas
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Genomic landscape and genetic manipulation of the black soldier fly Hermetia illucens, a natural waste recycler.

Authors:  Shuai Zhan; Gangqi Fang; Minmin Cai; Zongqing Kou; Jun Xu; Yanghui Cao; Liang Bai; Yixiang Zhang; Yongmao Jiang; Xingyu Luo; Jian Xu; Xia Xu; Longyu Zheng; Ziniu Yu; Hong Yang; Zhijian Zhang; Sibao Wang; Jeffery K Tomberlin; Jibin Zhang; Yongping Huang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 25.617

5.  Genome size evolution in pufferfish: an insight from BAC clone-based Diodon holocanthus genome sequencing.

Authors:  Baocheng Guo; Ming Zou; Xiaoni Gan; Shunping He
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Genome size evolution at the speciation level: the cryptic species complex Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera).

Authors:  Claus-Peter Stelzer; Simone Riss; Peter Stadler
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Comparative analysis of teleost genome sequences reveals an ancient intron size expansion in the zebrafish lineage.

Authors:  Stephen P Moss; Domino A Joyce; Stuart Humphries; Katherine J Tindall; David H Lunt
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  Comparisons between Arabidopsis thaliana and Drosophila melanogaster in relation to Coding and Noncoding Sequence Length and Gene Expression.

Authors:  Rachel Caldwell; Yan-Xia Lin; Ren Zhang
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 2.326

9.  A snapshot of histone modifications within transposable elements in Drosophila wild type strains.

Authors:  Rita Rebollo; Béatrice Horard; Flora Begeot; Marion Delattre; Eric Gilson; Cristina Vieira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Widespread evidence for horizontal transfer of transposable elements across Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Carolina Bartolomé; Xabier Bello; Xulio Maside
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.