Literature DB >> 16151181

Higher duplicability of less important genes in yeast genomes.

Xionglei He1, Jianzhi Zhang.   

Abstract

Gene duplication plays an important role in evolution because it is the primary source of new genes. Many recent studies showed that gene duplicability varies considerably among genes. Several considerations led us to hypothesize that less important genes have higher rates of successful duplications, where gene importance is measured by the fitness reduction caused by the deletion of the gene. Here, we test this hypothesis by comparing the importance of two groups of singleton genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sce). Group S genes did not duplicate in four other yeast species examined, whereas group D experienced duplication in these species. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found group D genes to be less important than group S genes. Specifically, 17% of group D genes are essential in Sce, compared to 28% for group S. Furthermore, deleting a group D gene in Sce reduces the fitness by 24% on average, compared to 38% for group S. Our subsequent analysis showed that less important genes have more cis-regulatory motifs, which could lead to a higher chance of subfunctionalization of duplicate genes and result in an enhanced rate of gene retention. Less important genes may also have weaker dosage imbalance effects and cause fewer genetic perturbations when duplicated. Regardless of the cause, our observation indicates that the previous finding of a less severe fitness consequence of deleting a duplicate gene than deleting a singleton gene is at least in part due to the fact that duplicate genes are intrinsically less important than singleton genes and suggests that the contribution of duplicate genes to genetic robustness has been overestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16151181     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  49 in total

1.  Gene Duplicability of Core Genes Is Highly Consistent across All Angiosperms.

Authors:  Zhen Li; Jonas Defoort; Setareh Tasdighian; Steven Maere; Yves Van de Peer; Riet De Smet
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Protein complexity, gene duplicability and gene dispensability in the yeast genome.

Authors:  Yeong-Shin Lin; Jenn-Kang Hwang; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 3.688

3.  Origins and impact of constraints in evolution of gene families.

Authors:  Boris E Shakhnovich; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Transcriptional reprogramming and backup between duplicate genes: is it a genomewide phenomenon?

Authors:  Xionglei He; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Preferential protection of protein interaction network hubs in yeast: evolved functionality of genetic redundancy.

Authors:  Ran Kafri; Orna Dahan; Jonathan Levy; Yitzhak Pilpel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The enrichment of TATA box and the scarcity of depleted proximal nucleosome in the promoters of duplicated yeast genes.

Authors:  Yuseob Kim; Jang H Lee; Gregory A Babbitt
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Does negative auto-regulation increase gene duplicability?

Authors:  Tobias Warnecke; Guang-Zhong Wang; Martin J Lercher; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Duplicability of self-interacting human genes.

Authors:  Asa Pérez-Bercoff; Takashi Makino; Aoife McLysaght
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Protein subcellular relocalization in the evolution of yeast singleton and duplicate genes.

Authors:  Wenfeng Qian; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Difference in gene duplicability may explain the difference in overall structure of protein-protein interaction networks among eukaryotes.

Authors:  Takeshi Hase; Yoshihito Niimura; Hiroshi Tanaka
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.