Literature DB >> 16150813

Breast cancer risk with postmenopausal hormonal treatment.

John A Collins1, Jennifer M Blake, Pier Giorgio Crosignani.   

Abstract

This review was designed to determine from the best evidence whether there is an association between postmenopausal hormonal treatment and breast cancer risk. Also, if there is an association, does it vary according to duration and cessation of use, type of regimen, type of hormonal product or route of administration; whether there is a differential effect on risk of lobular and ductal cancer; and whether hormone treatment is associated with breast cancers that have better prognostic factors? Data sources for the review included Medline, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Cochrane Library, 2005) and reference lists in the identified citations. Eligible citations addressed invasive breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women and involved use of the estrogen products with or without progestin that are used as treatment for menopausal symptoms. Abstracted data were demographic groupings, categories of hormone use, categories of breast cancer, two-by-two tables of exposure and outcome and adjusted odds ratios, relative risks (RRs) or hazard rates. Average estimates of risk were weighted by the inverse variance method, or if heterogeneous, using a random effects model. The average risk of invasive breast cancer with estrogen use was 0.79 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.61-1.02] in four randomized trials involving 12 643 women. The average breast cancer risk with estrogen-progestin use was 1.24 (95% CI = 1.03-1.50) in four randomized trials involving 19 756 women. The average risks reported in recent epidemiological studies were higher: 1.18 (95% CI = 1.01-1.38) with current use of estrogen alone and 1.70 (95% CI = 1.36-2.17) with current use of estrogen-progestin. The association of breast cancer with current use was stronger than the association with ever use, which includes past use. For past use, the increased breast cancer risk diminished soon after discontinuing hormones and normalized within 5 years. Reasonably adequate data do not show that breast cancer risk varies significantly with different types of estrogen or progestin preparations, lower dosages or different routes of administration, although there is a small difference between sequential and continuous progestin regimens. Epidemiological studies indicate that estrogen-progestin use increases risk of lobular more than ductal breast cancer, but the number of studies and cases of lobular cancer remains limited. Among important prognostic factors, the stage and grade in breast cancers associated with hormone use [corrected] do not differ significantly from those in non-users, but breast cancers in estrogen-progestin users are significantly more likely to be estrogen receptor (ER) positive. In conclusion, valid evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicates that breast cancer risk is increased with estrogen-progestin use more than with estrogen alone. Epidemiological evidence involving more than 1.5 million women agrees broadly with the trial findings. Although new studies are unlikely to alter the key findings about overall breast cancer risk, research is needed, however, to determine the role of progestin, evaluate the risk of lobular cancer and delineate effects of hormone use on receptor presence, prognosis and mortality in breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16150813     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmi028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  26 in total

1.  Soy isoflavone phase II metabolism differs between rodents and humans: implications for the effect on breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Kenneth D R Setchell; Nadine M Brown; Xueheng Zhao; Stephanie L Lindley; James E Heubi; Eileen C King; Mark J Messina
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Estrogen-alone therapy and invasive breast cancer incidence by dose, formulation, and route of delivery: findings from the WHI observational study.

Authors:  Chrisandra Shufelt; C Noel Bairey Merz; Mary B Pettinger; Lydia Choi; Rowan Chlebowski; Carolyn J Crandall; Simin Liu; Dorothy Lane; Ross Prentice; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Postmenopausal hormone therapy and ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Lisa Calvocoressi; Meredith H Stowe; Darryl Carter; Elizabeth B Claus
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Estrogen and progestogen use in postmenopausal women: July 2008 position statement of The North American Menopause Society.

Authors:  Wulf H Utian; David F Archer; Gloria A Bachmann; Christopher Gallagher; Francine n Grodstein; Julia R Heiman; Victor W Henderson; Howard N Hodis; Richard H Karas; Rogerio A Lobo; JoAnn E Manson; Robert L Reid; Peter J Schmidt; Cynthia A Stuenkel
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Genetic variation in the progesterone receptor and metabolism pathways and hormone therapy in relation to breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Kerryn W Reding; Christopher I Li; Noel S Weiss; Chu Chen; Christopher S Carlson; David Duggan; Kenneth E Thummel; Janet R Daling; Kathleen E Malone
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Fatal breast cancer risk in relation to use of unopposed estrogen and combined hormone therapy.

Authors:  Gaia Pocobelli; Polly A Newcomb; Christopher I Li; Linda S Cook; William E Barlow; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Milk ribonuclease-enriched lactoferrin induces positive effects on bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Bharadwaj; A G T Naidu; G V Betageri; N V Prasadarao; A S Naidu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Vaginal Estrogen Therapy for Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  M Moegele; S Buchholz; S Seitz; C Lattrich; O Ortmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  The influence of menopausal hormone therapy on tumour characteristics and survival in endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Chantal C Orgéas; Per Hall; Sara Wedrén; Paul W Dickman; Kamila Czene
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Comparative analysis of the uterine and mammary gland effects of drospirenone and medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Authors:  Christiane Otto; Iris Fuchs; Helga Altmann; Mario Klewer; Alexander Walter; Katja Prelle; Richardus Vonk; Karl-Heinrich Fritzemeier
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 4.736

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.