Literature DB >> 16150560

Is attrition bias a problem in neonatal follow-up?

E T M Hille1, A L den Ouden, M C Stuifbergen, G H W Verrips, A G C Vogels, R Brand, J Bennebroek Gravenhorst, S P Verloove-Vanhorick.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess whether attrition rate influences outcome in the follow-up of very preterm infants. STUDY
DESIGN: In a national follow-up study of infants born alive in 1983 in the Netherlands with a gestational age less than 32 weeks and/or a birth weight less than 1500 g, outcome was assessed separately for adolescents who responded early or late to a follow-up invitation at age 14 years. Neonatal data and outcome results of earlier assessments from early and late responders were compared to those of non-responders by univariate and nominal (polytomous logistic) regression analysis.
SUBJECTS: There were 723 (76%) early responders, 130 (14%) late responders and 109 (11%) non-responders.
RESULTS: We found significantly more non-Dutch origin and more disabilities and school problems at age 10 years in late- and especially in non-responders. At age 14 years, the health utility index was significantly lower in late responders compared to early responders. School outcome did not show difference in relation to the response groups.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the incidence of adverse outcome in very preterm infants is underestimated when follow-up is incomplete and hence response rate is not a negligible problem in the assessment of late outcome. Therefore, follow-up studies should include a drop-out analysis to enable comparison to other studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16150560     DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Early Hum Dev        ISSN: 0378-3782            Impact factor:   2.079


  4 in total

1.  Development and behaviour of 5-year-old very low birthweight infants.

Authors:  Liisi Rautava; Sture Andersson; Mika Gissler; Mikko Hallman; Unto Häkkinen; Emmi Korvenranta; Heikki Korvenranta; Jaana Leipälä; Outi Tammela; Liisa Lehtonen
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.785

2.  Lessons from SARS: a retrospective study of outpatient care during an infectious disease outbreak.

Authors:  Nehad Nasef; Karel O'Brien; Lesley Wylie; Sharon Unger
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 2.125

3.  Health-related quality of life from 20 to 32 years of age in very low birth weight individuals: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Elias Kjølseth Berdal; Arnt Erik Karlsen Wollum; Ingrid Marie Husby Hollund; Johanne Marie Iversen; Eero Kajantie; Kari Anne I Evensen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 4.  Quality of life of adults born very preterm or very low birth weight: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sylvia van der Pal; Malte Steinhof; Manon Grevinga; Dieter Wolke; Gijsbert Erik Verrips
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 2.299

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.