Literature DB >> 16150526

Volatilization of components from and water absorption of polyether impressions.

M Kanehira1, W J Finger, T Endo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of stone dies produced from impressions with polyether impression materials and a vinyl polysiloxane reference material after prolonged storage at 0, 50, or 100% relative humidity.
METHODS: Impressions were taken with light and heavy-bodied types of the polyethers P2 (P2L/H; Heraeus Kulzer) and Impregum (IML/H; 3M ESPE) and vinyl polysiloxane Flexitime (FLL/H; Heraeus Kulzer) from a truncated steel master cone in cylindrical trays giving 4 mm layer thickness at the prominence line. Impressions were taken at 23 degrees C, and stone dies were poured after 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 days storage at 23 degrees C and 0, 50, or 100% RH. Accuracy was determined as discrepancy between a steel ring with accurate fit on the master cone and the stone die and expressed as base diameter deviation Deltad (microm). One-way ANOVA and Duncan's post-hoc test were used for statistical data analysis (p<0.05).
RESULTS: P2L/H showed significant Deltad increase (30-240 microm) depending on storage time and humidity (p<0.05). Dies from IML/H at 0% RH were 90 through 180 microm enlarged, at 50% RH the maximum diameter increase was 60 microm, and at storage in 100% RH all dies were 25-120 microm smaller (p<0.05). Dies from FLL/H showed maximum Deltad deviations (55 to -10 microm).
CONCLUSIONS: P2 impressions release volatile substances during storage and should preferably be poured within less than 24 h. Impregum absorbs water and should be stored at <50% humidity. The accuracy of Flexitime is scarcely affected by storage time or by ambient humidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16150526     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  7 in total

1.  Randomized controlled clinical trial on the three-dimensional accuracy of fast-set impression materials.

Authors:  Heike Rudolph; Sebastian Quaas; Manuela Haim; Jörg Preißler; Michael H Walter; Rainer Koch; Ralph G Luthardt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Thiol-ene functionalized siloxanes for use as elastomeric dental impression materials.

Authors:  Megan A Cole; Katherine C Jankousky; Christopher N Bowman
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods.

Authors:  Satheesh B Haralur; Majed Saad Toman; Abdullah Ali Al-Shahrani; Abdullah Ali Al-Qarni
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-12-14

4.  The effect of prolonged storage and disinfection on the dimensional stability of 5 vinyl polyether silicone impression materials.

Authors:  Usama Nassar; Carlos Flores-Mir; Giseon Heo; Ysidora Torrealba
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Comparing the Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials in Making Duplicate Dies.

Authors:  Farshad Bajoghli; Mahmoud Sabouhi; Saeid Nosouhian; Amin Davoudi; Zeynab Behnamnia
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-07

6.  Effect of storage period on the accuracy of elastomeric impressions.

Authors:  Eduardo Batista Franco; Leonardo Fernandes da Cunha; Ana Raquel Benetti
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Effect of cervical relining of acrylic resin copings on the accuracy of stone dies obtained using a polyether impression material.

Authors:  André Tomazini Gomes de Sá; César Antunes de Freitas; Fátima Cristina de Sá; Wagner José Silva Ursi; Tânia Christina Simões; Márcia Furtado Antunes de Freitas
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.