Literature DB >> 16150369

Factors associated with the use of mind body therapies among United States adults with musculoskeletal pain.

Hilary A Tindle1, Peter Wolsko, Roger B Davis, David M Eisenberg, Russell S Phillips, Ellen P McCarthy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of mind body therapy use and correlates of use among adults with prolonged musculoskeletal pain, a group for whom mind body therapies are recommended.
DESIGN: The U.S. 1999 National Health Interview Survey. Prolonged musculoskeletal pain was defined as any soft tissue, joint, or bony pain for at least 1 month. Analyses used SUDAAN and reflect national estimates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of mind body medicine (relaxation techniques, imagery, biofeedback, and hypnosis) and prayer in the previous year.
RESULTS: Respondents (n=6079) with musculoskeletal pain were almost twice as likely as those without (n=24,722) to use mind body medicine (9% versus 5%, respectively, p<.0001) and prayer (20% versus 12%, respectively, p<.0001). After adjustment, men were less likely than women to use mind body medicine (odds ratio 0.55 [0.43-0.71]) and prayer (odds ratio 0.56 [0.48-0.66]). Those who had a high school education were less likely than those with training beyond high school to use mind body medicine (odds ratio 0.36 [0.28-0.47]) and prayer (odds ratio 0.61 [0.52-0.71]).
CONCLUSIONS: Mind body therapies are not used commonly by adults with prolonged musculoskeletal pain. Understanding barriers to their use may facilitate wider application in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16150369      PMCID: PMC4017935          DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2005.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Complement Ther Med        ISSN: 0965-2299            Impact factor:   2.446


  29 in total

1.  Research on adherence, behavior change, and mental health: a workshop overview.

Authors:  P Muehrer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 2.  Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain.

Authors:  D D Price
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  MSJAMA: mind matters, money matters: the cost-effectiveness of mind/body medicine.

Authors:  D S Sobel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-10-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  The primary care of patients who have bodily concerns.

Authors:  B Blackwell; N P De Morgan
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  1996-09

Review 5.  Analysis of recent literature concerning relaxation and imagery interventions for cancer pain.

Authors:  K G Wallace
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.592

6.  Adjunctive non-pharmacological analgesia for invasive medical procedures: a randomised trial.

Authors:  E V Lang; E G Benotsch; L J Fick; S Lutgendorf; M L Berbaum; K S Berbaum; H Logan; D Spiegel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-04-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Suffering: the contributions of persistent pain.

Authors:  C R Chapman; J Gavrin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-06-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The cost-effectiveness of mind-body medicine interventions.

Authors:  D S Sobel
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Patient education interventions in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analytic comparison with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug treatment.

Authors:  E Superio-Cabuslay; M M Ward; K R Lorig
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res       Date:  1996-08

10.  A meta-analysis of hypnotically induced analgesia: how effective is hypnosis?

Authors:  G H Montgomery; K N DuHamel; W H Redd
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  2000-04
View more
  8 in total

1.  Use of complementary and alternative medicine and self-rated health status: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Long T Nguyen; Roger B Davis; Ted J Kaptchuk; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Predictors of complementary and alternative medicine use among older Mexican Americans.

Authors:  Jose A Loera; Carlos Reyes-Ortiz; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Complement Ther Clin Pract       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.446

3.  Stress Management and Relaxation Techniques use among underserved inpatients in an inner city hospital.

Authors:  Paula Gardiner; Ekaterina Sadikova; Amanda C Filippelli; Suzanne Mitchell; Laura F White; Robert Saper; Ted J Kaptchuk; Brian W Jack; Lisa Fredman
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.446

Review 4.  Religiousness and spirituality in fibromyalgia and chronic pain patients.

Authors:  Alexander Moreira-Almeida; Harold G Koenig
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2008-10

5.  Complementary, Integrative, and Nondrug Therapy Use for Pain Among US Military Veterans on Long-term Opioids.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Goldsmith; Richard F MacLehose; Agnes C Jensen; Barbara Clothier; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Brian C Martinson; Melvin T Donaldson; Erin E Krebs
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.178

6.  Differences between Male and Female Consumers of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in a National US Population: A Secondary Analysis of 2012 NIHS Data.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Matthew J Leach; Helen Hall; Tobias Sundberg; Lesley Ward; David Sibbritt; Jon Adams
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  Reasons for continuing use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in students: a consumer commitment model.

Authors:  Fuschia M Sirois; Anita Salamonsen; Agnete E Kristoffersen
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.659

8.  Who Uses CAM? A Narrative Review of Demographic Characteristics and Health Factors Associated with CAM Use.

Authors:  Felicity L Bishop; G T Lewith
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 2.629

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.