Literature DB >> 16150028

Answering multiple-choice questions in high-stakes medical examinations.

Martin R Fischer1, Sibyl Herrmann, Veronika Kopp.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether changing initial answers during a multiple-choice question (MCQ) test in medicine brings about better overall test results, as has been shown in other academic fields.
METHODS: A total of 36 answer books from the German Second National Medical Board Examination, with 580 MCQs (where 1 answer out of 5 must be selected), were used for analysis.
RESULTS: We confirmed that high-stakes MCQ test scores in medicine did indeed improve when students changed their answers once. Further changes of answers did not improve the scores.
CONCLUSIONS: In written, high-stakes medical examinations, we recommend that students be encouraged, after further reflection, to change their answers in MCQ tests for questions for which they had previously had doubts about the answers.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16150028     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02243.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  7 in total

1.  Diverse Brains.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  Gen Psychol       Date:  2015-04

Review 2.  Measuring Metacognitive Knowledge, Monitoring, and Control in the Pharmacy Classroom and Experiential Settings.

Authors:  Michelle L Rivers; John Dunlosky; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Answer changing in multiple choice assessment change that answer when in doubt--and spread the word!

Authors:  Daniel Bauer; Veronika Kopp; Martin R Fischer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Cognitive problem solving patterns of medical students correlate with success in diagnostic case solutions.

Authors:  Jan Kiesewetter; René Ebersbach; Anja Görlitz; Matthias Holzer; Martin R Fischer; Ralf Schmidmaier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Knowledge is not enough to solve the problems - The role of diagnostic knowledge in clinical reasoning activities.

Authors:  Jan Kiesewetter; Rene Ebersbach; Nike Tsalas; Matthias Holzer; Ralf Schmidmaier; Martin R Fischer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Investigation of answer changes on the USMLE® Step 2 Clinical Knowledge examination.

Authors:  Wenli Ouyang; Polina Harik; Brian E Clauser; Miguel A Paniagua
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Significant increase in factual knowledge with web-assisted problem-based learning as part of an undergraduate cardio-respiratory curriculum.

Authors:  T Raupach; C Münscher; T Pukrop; S Anders; S Harendza
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.853

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.