Literature DB >> 16149207

Engelhardt and children: the failure of libertarian bioethics in pediatric interactions.

Stephen Hanson1.   

Abstract

In Engelhardt's secular bioethics, moral obligations derive from contracts and agreements between rational persons, and no infants or children and few adolescents meet Engelhardt's requirements for being a rational person. This is a problem, as one cannot have any direct secular moral obligations toward nonpersons such as infants and adolescents. The Engelhardtian concepts of ownership, indenture, and social personhood, which are meant to allow the theory to accommodate children and adolescents adequately, fail to give an Engelhardtian any actual means of determining the right action to take in difficult cases, even on his or her own terms. Thus, the theory is incapable of determining the morally correct action to take in cases involving children and therefore is unhelpful in dealing with moral questions involving children.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Philosophical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16149207     DOI: 10.1353/ken.2005.0013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J        ISSN: 1054-6863


  2 in total

1.  Moral acquaintances: Loewy, Wildes, and beyond.

Authors:  Stephen S Hanson
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2007-09

2.  Charlie Gard and the weight of parental rights to seek experimental treatment.

Authors:  Giles Birchley
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.926

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.