BACKGROUND: Somatic loss of the 9q allele as well as alteration of the tumor suppressor p53 occurs commonly in bladder cancers. Although alteration of p53 has been strongly associated with invasive stage disease, the prognostic significance of 9q loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and the relations between these alterations are less well defined. METHODS: The 9q LOH was examined at five microsatellites and p53 alterations (mutation and persistent immunohistochemical staining) in a population-based case series of 271 newly diagnosed bladder cancer patients. Loss of heterozygosity was scored quantitatively and p53 mutation completed using single-strand conformation polymorphism screening followed by sequencing. RESULTS: Overall, allelic loss at 9q was detected in 74.5% (202/271) of cases and allele loss was associated with invasive disease (P < 0.05). Although based on small numbers, all nine in situ lesions contained 9q LOH. Age, gender, and smoking were not significantly associated with chromosome 9q allele loss. Both intense persistent p53 staining and LOH at 9q were independently associated with invasive disease (P < 10(-14) and P < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data, using a population-based sample, suggest a relation between 9q LOH and invasive stage bladder cancer, and thereby suggests that a tumor suppressor gene at this loci, in addition to p53, may be important in the development of this more aggressive form of the disease. (c) 2005 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Somatic loss of the 9q allele as well as alteration of the tumor suppressor p53 occurs commonly in bladder cancers. Although alteration of p53 has been strongly associated with invasive stage disease, the prognostic significance of 9q loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and the relations between these alterations are less well defined. METHODS: The 9q LOH was examined at five microsatellites and p53 alterations (mutation and persistent immunohistochemical staining) in a population-based case series of 271 newly diagnosed bladder cancerpatients. Loss of heterozygosity was scored quantitatively and p53 mutation completed using single-strand conformation polymorphism screening followed by sequencing. RESULTS: Overall, allelic loss at 9q was detected in 74.5% (202/271) of cases and allele loss was associated with invasive disease (P < 0.05). Although based on small numbers, all nine in situ lesions contained 9q LOH. Age, gender, and smoking were not significantly associated with chromosome 9q allele loss. Both intense persistent p53 staining and LOH at 9q were independently associated with invasive disease (P < 10(-14) and P < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data, using a population-based sample, suggest a relation between 9q LOH and invasive stage bladder cancer, and thereby suggests that a tumor suppressor gene at this loci, in addition to p53, may be important in the development of this more aggressive form of the disease. (c) 2005 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Dennis Liang Fei; Hua Li; Courtney D Kozul; Kendall E Black; Samer Singh; Julie A Gosse; James DiRenzo; Kathleen A Martin; Baolin Wang; Joshua W Hamilton; Margaret R Karagas; David J Robbins Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Dennis Liang Fei; Avencia Sanchez-Mejias; Zhiqiang Wang; Colin Flaveny; Jun Long; Samer Singh; Jezabel Rodriguez-Blanco; Robert Tokhunts; Camilla Giambelli; Karoline J Briegel; Wolfgang A Schulz; A Jay Gandolfi; Margaret Karagas; Teresa A Zimmers; Merce Jorda; Pablo Bejarano; Anthony J Capobianco; David J Robbins Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Guillaume Legrand; Hany Soliman; Francis Dubosq; Jérôme Vérine; François Desgrandchamps; Hugues de Thé; Pierre Mongiat-Artus; Guillaume Ploussard Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2011-04-05 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Antonio Maraver; Pablo J Fernandez-Marcos; Timothy P Cash; Marinela Mendez-Pertuz; Marta Dueñas; Paolo Maietta; Paola Martinelli; Maribel Muñoz-Martin; Mónica Martínez-Fernández; Marta Cañamero; Giovanna Roncador; Jorge L Martinez-Torrecuadrada; Dimitrios Grivas; Jose Luis de la Pompa; Alfonso Valencia; Jesús M Paramio; Francisco X Real; Manuel Serrano Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Florian T Merkle; Sulagna Ghosh; Giulio Genovese; Robert E Handsaker; Seva Kashin; Daniel Meyer; Konrad J Karczewski; Colm O'Dushlaine; Carlos Pato; Michele Pato; Daniel G MacArthur; Steven A McCarroll; Kevin Eggan Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 25.269
Authors: G Pignot; A Vieillefond; S Vacher; M Zerbib; B Debre; R Lidereau; D Amsellem-Ouazana; I Bieche Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 7.640