Literature DB >> 16149070

Can parents adjust to the idea that their child is at risk for a sudden death?: Psychological impact of risk for long QT syndrome.

Karin S W H Hendriks1, F J M Grosfeld, J P van Tintelen, I M van Langen, A A M Wilde, J van den Bout, H F J ten Kroode.   

Abstract

Can a parent adjust to the idea that its child is at risk for a sudden death? This question is raised by a diagnostic procedure in which children were tested for an inherited Long QT Syndrome (LQTS). This potentially life-threatening but treatable cardiac arrhythmia syndrome may cause sudden death, especially in children and young adults. The long-term psychological effects are described for parents whose children were tested for inherited LQTS. The adverse short-term impact of such testing has been described previously. The goal of this investigation is to determine whether this distress endures. Thirty-six parents completed measures of psychological distress. With the twenty-four parents of carrier children, a semi-structured interview was held 18 months after DNA disclosure. Parents of carrier children reported more distress than parents of non-carrier children. Parents of carrier children remained vulnerable to high levels of distress; up to one-third of these parents showed clinically relevant high levels of distress. High levels of distress were reported by parents of carrier children who (1) were highly distressed at previous assessments, (2) were familiar with the disease for a longer time, (3) had experienced a sudden death in the family, (4) were lesser educated, and who (5) were unsatisfied with the given information. Parents were particularly concerned about possible hazardous behavior during puberty. We conclude that the continuous threat of developing LQTS symptoms despite prophylactic treatment affected the psychological well-being of the parents for a long time. In light of the tempetuous developments in the areas of cardiac genetics, periodical information on new insight and developments may act as a buffer for the parents' (growing) concerns about their child's inherited disorder. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16149070     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  15 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular genetic medicine: evolving concepts, rationale, and implementation.

Authors:  Ray E Hershberger
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Psychosocial functioning of parents of children with heart disease-describing the landscape.

Authors:  Jo Wray; Amy Cassedy; Michelle M Ernst; Rodney C Franklin; Katherine Brown; Bradley S Marino
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Reproductive Decision Making and Genetic Predisposition to Sudden Cardiac Death.

Authors:  Dorit Barlevy; David Wasserman; Marina Stolerman; Kathleen E Erskine; Siobhan M Dolan
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2012-06-19

4.  Psychosocial Implications of Living with Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia in Adulthood.

Authors:  Ebony Richardson; Catherine Spinks; Andrew Davis; Christian Turner; John Atherton; Julie McGaughran; Christopher Semsarian; Jodie Ingles
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Impediments to DNA testing and cascade screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and Long QT syndrome: a qualitative study of patient experiences.

Authors:  Andrew Smart
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  LQTS parents' reflections about genetic risk knowledge and their need to know or not to know their children's carrier status.

Authors:  Margrete Mangset; Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Minding the Genes: a Multidisciplinary Approach towards Genetic Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Ashley Rhodes; Lindsey Rosman; John Cahill; Jodie Ingles; Brittney Murray; Crystal Tichnell; Cynthia A James; Samuel F Sears
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Comparing test-specific distress of susceptibility versus deterministic genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Michael R Cassidy; J Scott Roberts; Thomas D Bird; Ellen J Steinbart; L Adrienne Cupples; Clara A Chen; Erin Linnenbringer; Robert C Green
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 21.566

9.  Experiences, considerations and emotions relating to cardiogenetic evaluation in relatives of young sudden cardiac death victims.

Authors:  Christian van der Werf; Astrid T Onderwater; Irene M van Langen; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Health status in patients at risk of inherited arrhythmias and sudden unexpected death compared to the general population.

Authors:  Anniken Hamang; Geir Egil Eide; Karin Nordin; Berit Rokne; Cathrine Bjorvatn; Nina Øyen
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.