Literature DB >> 16148661

Sedation during voiding cystourethrography: comparison of the efficacy and safety of using oral midazolam and continuous flow nitrous oxide.

Ilan Keidan1, Ruth Zaslansky, Margalith Weinberg, Aviva Ben-Shlush, Jeffrey M Jacobson, Arie Augarten, Yoram Mor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compare the efficacy and safety profile of oral midazolam and continuous flow 50% nitrous oxide (N(2)O) for alleviating anxiety and pain during voiding cystourethrography (VCU) in children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized clinical trial study was conducted in the radiology unit of a tertiary care center. Children older than 3 years scheduled for VCU were given either 0.5 mg/kg midazolam orally or continuous flow 50% N(2)O. Main outcomes were degree of anxiety and pain as assessed by the attending nurse and radiologist performing the test using a behavioral anxiety score, a distress score and an overall satisfaction score, side effects and recovery profile.
RESULTS: The study included 47 children (89% girls) with a mean age of 6 years (range 3 to 15). There were 24 subjects in the midazolam group and 23 in the N(2)O group. Midazolam and N(2)O provided adequate anxiety and pain relief to perform the examination, yet children given N(2)O required less restraining and experienced a significantly shorter recovery time (29 +/- 10 vs 63 +/- 25 minutes, p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous flow 50% nitrous oxide and oral midazolam are comparably safe and effective in reducing anxiety and distress during VCU in children older than 3 years. However, N(2)O provides a more rapid onset of sedating effect and has a shorter recovery time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16148661     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000176595.49213.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

Review 1.  Options and Considerations for Procedural Sedation in Pediatric Imaging.

Authors:  John W Berkenbosch
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Sedation and the VCUG.

Authors:  Karen Blumberg
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-12-30

3.  Sedation with nitrous oxide compared with no sedation during catheterization for urologic imaging in children.

Authors:  Judith L Zier; Kathryn A Kvam; Stephen C Kurachek; Marsha Finkelstein
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-05-22

4.  Utility of sedation for young children undergoing dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scans.

Authors:  Nader Shaikh; Alejandro Hoberman; Ron Keren; Anastasia Ivanova; Harvey A Ziessman; Gang Cui; Tej K Mattoo; Sonika Bhatnagar; Milan D Nadkarni; Marva Moxey-Mims; William A Primack
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-06-10

Review 5.  Non-Intravenous Sedatives and Analgesics for Procedural Sedation for Imaging Procedures in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Amber Thomas; Jamie L Miller; Kevin Couloures; Peter N Johnson
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

Review 6.  Use of sedative drugs at reducing the side effects of voiding cystourethrography in children.

Authors:  Anahita Alizadeh; Maryam Naseri; Yalda Ravanshad; Shahabaddin Sorouri; Malihe Banihassan; Anoush Azarfar
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Receiving Sedation for Voiding Cystourethrography.

Authors:  Keith A Hanson; Shane C Rainey; Nadia Shaikh; Michele K Beekman
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-06

Review 8.  Urodynamic studies for management of urinary incontinence in children and adults.

Authors:  Keiran David Clement; Marie Carmela M Lapitan; Muhammad Imran Omar; Cathryn M A Glazener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-29

9.  Anxiety in children undergoing VCUG: sedation or no sedation?

Authors:  David W Herd
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2008
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.