Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: economic burden and quality of life: literature review.

The purpose of this review was answer 2 main questions: what is the impact of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) on the patient's quality of life and how great is the economic burden of this disease on the health care payers and providers. Patients with CLL typically do not receive any treatment soon after the initial diagnosis. Although there is no known cure for CLL yet, when treated, the patients receive aggressive and expensive therapies (eg, chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation). A rigorous and systematic literature review was performed of English-language articles published in 1990-2002. It was supplemented with additional articles published before 1990 for completeness and additional references to fill the gaps identified in the published medical literature. The literature on the quality of life (QOL) of CLL patients is very limited. We identified only 8 articles, and none of them analyzed the QOL in untreated CLL patients. Because CLL is a disease affecting adults, especially the elderly, all 8 studies measured the QOL in the adult population. QOL difficulties include fear of death and disability, problems gaining employment or health insurance, and fatigue. No specific leukemia or CLL instruments but general QOL instruments (eg, I-HRQL) were identified and some cancer-specific ones (eg, EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-G, FACT Anemia, FACT-Fatigue). Interestingly, a FACT-Bone Marrow Transplant instrument exists, although we found no study on CLL that used it. Even the literature on the economic burden of CLL is very limited. We identified 13 studies on the cost of CLL: Most of them were cost-identification or cost-comparison studies, and 5 dealt with the cost-effectiveness of medical interventions to treat CLL. Cost drivers identified for CLL were the chemotherapy costs, intravenous immunoglobulin costs, transplantation costs, and costs associated with the differential staining cytotoxicity assay. We identified very few articles on the QOL of CLL patients and therefore cannot draw strong conclusions about the key QOL predictors. Nevertheless, patients with anemia were found to have a better QOL if they had higher hemoglobin counts and good response to erythropoietin treatment. The articles published seem to demonstrate that the older the age of the patient was, the poorer the QOL. The main cost drivers identified for CLL were related to the treatment chosen (eg, chemotherapy, bone marrow transplantation). There are hints that higher costs often result from the delivery of non-optimal therapy that leads to adverse events, infections, and drug resistance. In summary, the impact of this disease on the health care budget of the different health care providers and payers as well as on the patient's QOL is substantially unknown, calling for appropriate economic and QOL studies.