Literature DB >> 16148209

The role of the family in genetic testing: theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions.

Susan K Peterson1.   

Abstract

This article addresses conceptual challenges and theoretical approaches for examining the role of the family in responding and adapting to genetic testing for inherited conditions. Using a family systems perspective, family-based constructs that are relevant to genetic testing may be organized into three domains: family communication, organization and structure of family relationships, and health-related cognitions and beliefs shared within families. Empirical findings are presented from key content areas in family-based genetics research, including family communication, how genetic testing affects family relationships, psychological responses to genetic testing in the family context, and family-based influences on health decisions. Future research should explore decision making about genetic testing or behavior change specifically within the context of the family system and should identify family-based determinants of genetic testing outcomes.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16148209     DOI: 10.1177/1090198105278751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  51 in total

1.  Understanding patterns of health communication in families at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: examining the effect of conclusive versus indeterminate genetic test results.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Donald W Hadley; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2011-06-24

2.  The role of genetics in the provision of essential public health services.

Authors:  Grace Wang; Carolyn Watts
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Legacies and Relationships: Diverse Social Networks and BRCA1/2 Risk Management Decisions and Actions.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Allison Werner-Lin; Lindsey Hoskins; Jennifer Young; Jennifer T Loud; June Peters; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Fam Nurs       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.818

4.  Extended family impact of genetic testing: the experiences of X-linked carrier grandmothers.

Authors:  Anna Lehmann; Beverley S Speight; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  How can psychological science inform research about genetic counseling for clinical genomic sequencing?

Authors:  Cynthia M Khan; Christine Rini; Barbara A Bernhardt; J Scott Roberts; Kurt D Christensen; James P Evans; Kyle B Brothers; Myra I Roche; Jonathan S Berg; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Efficacy of the health belief model for predicting intention to pursue genetic testing for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Amanda Cyr; Tim Allen Dunnagan; George Haynes
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Preparing individuals to communicate genetic test results to their relatives: report of a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Susan V Montgomery; Andrea M Barsevick; Brian L Egleston; Ruth Bingler; Karen Ruth; Suzanne M Miller; John Malick; Terrence P Cescon; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  On the development of a decision support intervention for mothers undergoing BRCA1/2 cancer genetic testing regarding communicating test results to their children.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A Demarco; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  A content analysis of the views of genetics professionals on race, ancestry, and genetics.

Authors:  Sarah C Nelson; Joon-Ho Yu; Jennifer K Wagner; Tanya M Harrell; Charmaine D Royal; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2019-01-04

10.  Communicating with Daughters About Familial Risk of Breast Cancer: Individual, Family, and Provider Influences on Women's Knowledge of Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Juan L Rodriguez; Nikki A Hawkins; Ashwini Soman; Mary C White; M Elizabeth Hodgson; Lisa A DeRoo; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.