Literature DB >> 16148206

Communicating risk information in genetic counseling: an observational study.

Susan Michie1, Kathryn Lester, Julia Pinto, Theresa M Marteau.   

Abstract

This study investigates risk communication within genetic counselling. Transcripts of 115 U.K. genetic consultations were reliably coded into form of risk expression used, whether the patient responded with understanding and agreement or showed signs of misunderstanding or disagreement, or did not respond at all, and whether clinicians assessed patient comprehension. Of the 492 risk expressions used, 53% were words and 47% were numbers (32% probabilities and 15% percentages). There was no association between form of risk expression and response. Clinicians assessed comprehension on only 25% of occasions, less often following the use of words than numbers, and on only 9% of occasions when there was no response to their risk communication. Because patients did not respond to 43% of risk communications, there is a concern that patients may make decisions without understanding the risks involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16148206     DOI: 10.1177/1090198105278562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  12 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Jennifer Irle; Elizabeth Lobb; Kristine Barlow-Stewart
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A Qualitative Look into Israeli Genetic Experts' Insights Regarding Culturally Competent Genetic Counseling and Recommendations for Its Enhancement.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Descriptive and numeric estimation of risk for psychotic disorders among affected individuals and relatives: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Jehannine C Austin; Catriona Hippman; William G Honer
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.222

4.  Negotiating desires and options: how mothers who carry the fragile X gene experience reproductive decisions.

Authors:  Kelly Amanda Raspberry; Debra Skinner
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Evaluation of the template letter regarding the disclosure of genetic information within the family in France.

Authors:  Cécile Zordan; Laetitia Monteil; Emmanuelle Haquet; Christophe Cordier; Eva Toussaint; Pauline Roche; Virginie Dorian; Aline Maillard; Edouard Lhomme; Laura Richert; Laurent Pasquier; Linda Akloul; Nicolas Taris; Didier Lacombe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-03-27

6.  Effects of a pre-visit educational website on information recall and needs fulfilment in breast cancer genetic counselling, a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Cancer genetic counseling: communication and counselees' post-visit satisfaction, cognitions, anxiety, and needs fulfillment.

Authors:  Arwen H Pieterse; Alexandra M van Dulmen; Frits A Beemer; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Design of the BRISC study: a multicentre controlled clinical trial to optimize the communication of breast cancer risks in genetic counselling.

Authors:  Caroline F Ockhuysen-Vermey; Lidewij Henneman; Christi J van Asperen; Jan C Oosterwijk; Fred H Menko; Daniëlle R M Timmermans
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information.

Authors:  Fiona Ulph; Ellen Townsend; Cris Glazebrook
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Counselees' Expressed Level of Understanding of the Risk Estimate and Surveillance Recommendation are Not Associated with Breast Cancer Surveillance Adherence.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Henrietta Dijkstra; Ivette Wieffer; Arjen Witkamp; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.