Literature DB >> 16147845

Four-dimensional fetal echocardiography with spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC): a systematic study of standard cardiac views assessed by different observers.

Luís F Gonçalves1, Jimmy Espinoza, Roberto Romero, Wesley Lee, Marjorie C Treadwell, Raywin Huang, Greggory Devore, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa, Mary Lou Schoen, Betsy Beyer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the agreement between observers and reproducibility of a technique to display standard cardiac views of the left and right ventricular outflow tracts from four-dimensional volume datasets acquired with Spatiotemporal Image Correlation (STIC).
METHODS: A technique was developed to obtain dynamic multiplanar images of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) from volume datasets acquired with STIC. Volume datasets were acquired from fetuses with normal cardiac anatomy. Twenty volume datasets of satisfactory quality were pre-selected by one investigator. The data was randomly assigned for a blinded review by two independent observers with previous experience in fetal echocardiography. Only one volume dataset was used for each fetus. After a training session, the observers obtained standardized cardiac views of the LVOT and RVOT, which were scored on a scale of 1 to 5, based on diagnostic value and image quality (1=unacceptable, 2=marginal, 3=acceptable, 4=good, and 5=excellent). Median scores and interquartile range, as well as inter- and intraobserver agreement were calculated for each view.
RESULTS: The mean menstrual age at the time of volume acquisition was 25.5+/-4.5 weeks. Median scores (interquartile range) for LVOT images, obtained by the first and second observers, were 3.5 (2.25-5.00) and 4 (3.00-5.00), respectively. The median scores (interquartile range) for RVOT images obtained by the first and second observers were 3 (3.00-5.00) and 3 (2.00-4.00), respectively. The interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient for the LVOT was 0.693 (95% CI 0.380-0.822), and 0.696 (95% CI 0.382-0.866) for the RVOT. For the intraobserver agreement analysis, observer 1 gave higher scores to the LVOT the second time the volumes were analyzed [LVOT: 3.50 (2.25-5.00) vs. 5.00 (4.00-5.00, p=0.008)].
CONCLUSION: STIC can be reproducibly used to evaluate fetal cardiac outflow tracts by independent examiners. Slightly better image quality rating scores during the intraobserver variability trial suggests the presence of a learning curve for the manipulation and analysis of volume data obtained by STIC.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16147845     DOI: 10.1080/14767050500127765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  11 in total

Review 1.  Three-dimensional ultrasound of the fetus: how does it help?

Authors:  Luis F Gonçalves
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-01-29

2.  Prospective evaluation of the fetal heart using Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE).

Authors:  M Garcia; L Yeo; R Romero; D Haggerty; I Giardina; S S Hassan; T Chaiworapongsa; E Hernandez-Andrade
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 3.  Three- and 4-dimensional ultrasound in obstetric practice: does it help?

Authors:  Luís F Gonçalves; Wesley Lee; Jimmy Espinoza; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  A systematic approach to the use of the multiplanar display in evaluation of abnormal vascular connections to the fetal heart using 4-dimensional ultrasonography.

Authors:  Jimmy Espinoza; Sonia S Hassan; Francesca Gotsch; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Wesley Lee; Offer Erez; Luís F Gonçalves; Mary Lou Schoen; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 5.  Three- and four-dimensional ultrasound in fetal echocardiography: an up-to-date overview.

Authors:  B M E Adriaanse; J M G van Vugt; M C Haak
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Repeatability and reproducibility of fetal cardiac ventricular volume calculations using spatiotemporal image correlation and virtual organ computer-aided analysis.

Authors:  Neil Hamill; Roberto Romero; Sonia S Hassan; Wesley Lee; Stephen A Myers; Pooja Mittal; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Edi Vaisbuch; Jimmy Espinoza; Francesca Gotsch; Angela Carletti; Luís F Gonçalves; Lami Yeo
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Four-dimensional ultrasonography of the fetal heart using a novel Tomographic Ultrasound Imaging display.

Authors:  Luís F Gonçalves; Jimmy Espinoza; Roberto Romero; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Betsy Swope; Jyh Kae Nien; Offer Erez; Eleazar Soto; Marjorie C Treadwell
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.901

8.  Assessment of a single monomorphic ventricular ectopy from the right ventricular outflow tract in standard and high resolution electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Dariusz Kozłowski; Adam Kosiński; Alicja Dąbrowska-Kugacka; Ewa Lewicka-Nowak; Maria Dudziak; Marek Grzybiak; Grzegorz Raczak
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  Prenatal screening of fetal ventriculoarterial connections: benefits of 4D technique in fetal heart imaging.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Miao Fan; Faiza Amber Siddiqui; Meilian Wang; Wei Sun; Xue Sun; Wenjia Lei; Ying Zhang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  Three-dimensional visualisation of the fetal heart using prenatal MRI with motion-corrected slice-volume registration: a prospective, single-centre cohort study.

Authors:  David F A Lloyd; Kuberan Pushparajah; John M Simpson; Joshua F P van Amerom; Milou P M van Poppel; Alexander Schulz; Bernard Kainz; Maria Deprez; Maelene Lohezic; Joanna Allsop; Sujeev Mathur; Hannah Bellsham-Revell; Trisha Vigneswaran; Marietta Charakida; Owen Miller; Vita Zidere; Gurleen Sharland; Mary Rutherford; Joseph V Hajnal; Reza Razavi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 202.731

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.