Literature DB >> 16147844

Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length.

S M Rane1, R R Guirgis, B Higgins, K H Nicolaides.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of pre-induction cervical length, parity, gestational age at induction, maternal age and body mass index (BMI) on the possibility of successful delivery in women undergoing induction of labor.
METHODS: In 822 singleton pregnancies, induction of labor was carried out at 35 to 42(+6) weeks of gestation. The cervical length was measured by transvaginal sonography before induction. The effect of cervical length, parity, gestational age, maternal age and BMI on the interval between induction and vaginal delivery within 24 hours was investigated using Cox's proportional hazard model. The likelihood of vaginal delivery within 24 hours and risk for cesarean section overall and for failure to progress was investigated using logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Successful vaginal delivery within 24 hours of induction occurred in 530 (64.5%) of the 822 women. Cesarean sections were performed in 161 (19.6%) cases, 70 for fetal distress and 91 for failure to progress. Cox's proportional hazard model indicated that significant prediction of the induction-to-delivery interval was provided by the pre-induction cervical length (HR=0.89, 95% CI 0.88-0.90, p<0.0001), parity (HR=2.39, 95% CI 1.98-2.88, p<0.0001), gestational age (HR=1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.2, p=or<0.0001) and birth weight percentile (HR=0.995, 95% CI 0.99-0.995, p=0.001), but not by maternal age or BMI. Logistic regression analysis indicated that significant prediction of the likelihood of vaginal delivery within 24 hours was provided by pre-induction cervical length (OR=0.86, 95% CI 0.84-0.88, p<0.0001), parity (OR=3.59, 95% CI 2.47-5.22, p<0.0001) and gestational age (OR=1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.32, p=or<0.0001) but not by BMI or maternal age. The risk of cesarean section overall was significantly associated with all the variables under consideration, i.e., pre-induction cervical length (OR=1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.11, p<0.0001), parity (OR=0.25, 95% CI 0.17-0.38, p<0.0001), BMI (OR=1.85, 95% CI 1.24-2.74, p=0.0024), gestational age (OR=0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.98, p=0.0215) and maternal age (OR=1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p=0.0192). The risk of cesarean section for failure to progress was also significantly associated with pre-induction cervical length (OR=1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.14, p<0.0001), parity (OR=0.26, 95% CI 0.15-0.43, p<0.0001), gestational age (OR=0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.96, p=0.0097) and BMI (OR=2.07, 95% CI 1.27-3.37, p=0.0036).
CONCLUSION: In women undergoing induction of labor, pre-induction cervical length, parity, gestational age at induction, maternal age and BMI have a significant effect on the interval between induction and delivery within 24 hours, likelihood of vaginal delivery within 24 hours and the risk of cesarean section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16147844     DOI: 10.1080/14767050500127690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  7 in total

1.  Manipal Cervical Scoring System by Transvaginal Ultrasound in Predicting Successful Labour Induction.

Authors:  Neha Bajpai; Rajesh Bhakta; Pratap Kumar; Lavanya Rai; Shripad Hebbar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-05-01

Review 2.  Timing of delivery in women with diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  Howard Berger; Nir Melamed
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2014-01-15

3.  Does third trimester cervical length predict duration of first stage of labor?

Authors:  György Léhner; Philipp Reif; Alexander Avian; Martina Kollmann; Ioana-Claudia Lakovschek; Uwe Lang; Daniela Ulrich
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 4.  Update on inherited disorders of haemostasis and pregnancy.

Authors:  Orly Lavee; Giselle Kidson-Gerber
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2016-01-20

Review 5.  Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening.

Authors:  Ifeanyichukwu U Ezebialu; Ahizechukwu C Eke; George U Eleje; Chukwuemeka E Nwachukwu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-12

6.  Pre-induction translabial ultrasound measurements in predicting mode of delivery compared to bishop score: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Soghra Khazardoost; Fahimeh Ghotbizadeh Vahdani; Sahar Latifi; Sedighe Borna; Maryam Tahani; Mohammad Ali Rezaei; Masoomeh Shafaat
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinical trial.

Authors:  Zainab Hananah Abang Abdullah; Kah Teik Chew; V Ramesh V Velayudham; Zainab Yahaya; Amilia Afzan Mohd Jamil; Muhammad Azrai Abu; Nur Azurah Abdul Ghani; Nor Azlin Mohamed Ismail
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.