Literature DB >> 16147800

A modified electronic key feature examination for undergraduate medical students: validation threats and opportunities.

Martin R Fischer1, Veronika Kopp, Matthias Holzer, Franz Ruderich, Jana Jünger.   

Abstract

The purpose of our study was the development and validation of a modified electronic key feature exam of clinical decision-making skills for undergraduate medical students. Therefore, the reliability of the test (15 items), the item difficulty level, the item-total correlations and correlations to other measures of knowledge (40 item MC-test and 580 items of German MC-National Licensing Exam, Part II) were calculated. Based on the guidelines provided by the Medical Council of Canada, a modified electronic key feature exam for internal medicine consisting of 15 key features (KFs) was developed for fifth year German medical students. Long menu (LM) and short menu (SM) question formats were used. Acceptance was assessed through a questionnaire. Thirty-seven students from four medical schools voluntarily participated in the study. The reliability of the key feature exam was 0.65 (Cronbach's alpha). The items' difficulty level scores were between 0.3 and 0.8 and the item-total correlations between 0.0 and 0.4. Correlations between the results of the KF exam and the other measures of knowledge were intermediate (r between 0.44 and 0.47) as well as the learners' level of acceptance. The modified electronic KF examination is a feasible and reliable evaluation tool that may be implemented for the assessment of clinical undergraduate training.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16147800     DOI: 10.1080/01421590500078471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  18 in total

1.  An innovative method to assess clinical reasoning skills: Clinical reasoning tests in the second national medical science Olympiad in Iran.

Authors:  Mitra Amini; Mohsen Moghadami; Javad Kojuri; Hamidreza Abbasi; Ali Arhami Doolat Abadi; Nezar Ali Molaee; Elham Pishbin; Hamid Reza Javadzade; Vahid Monsef Kasmaee; Hasan Vakili; Mohamad Ali Reis Sadat; Roghaye Akbari; Bita Omidvar; Afshin Shafaghi; Marzie Dehbozorgian; Mohammad Morad Jafari; Alireza Monajemi; Kamran Soltani Arabshahi; Peyman Adibi; Bernard Charlin
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-10-17

2.  [The Erlangen examination. An alternative to multiple choice testing for German neurology students].

Authors:  J G Heckmann; C Rauch; M Dütsch; C Lang; M Weih; S Schwab
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Learning the facts in medical school is not enough: which factors predict successful application of procedural knowledge in a laboratory setting?

Authors:  Ralf Schmidmaier; Stephan Eiber; Rene Ebersbach; Miriam Schiller; Inga Hege; Matthias Holzer; Martin R Fischer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Comparison between Long-Menu and Open-Ended Questions in computerized medical assessments. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas Rotthoff; Thomas Baehring; Hans-Dieter Dicken; Urte Fahron; Bernd Richter; Martin R Fischer; Werner A Scherbaum
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 5.  Clinical reasoning assessment through medical expertise theories: past, present and future directions.

Authors:  Elham Boushehri; Kamran Soltani Arabshahi; Alireza Monajemi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-06-15

6.  Long-menu questions in computer-based assessments: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Bernard Cerutti; Katherine Blondon; Annick Galetto
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Effects of additional team-based learning on students' clinical reasoning skills: a pilot study.

Authors:  Meike Jost; Peter Brüstle; Marianne Giesler; Michel Rijntjes; Jochen Brich
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-07-14

8.  Virtual patients design and its effect on clinical reasoning and student experience: a protocol for a randomised factorial multi-centre study.

Authors:  James Bateman; Maggie E Allen; Jane Kidd; Nick Parsons; David Davies
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Use of key feature questions in summative assessment of veterinary medicine students.

Authors:  Elisabeth Schaper; Andrea Tipold; Jan P Ehlers
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.146

10.  Differences in procedural knowledge after a "spaced" and a "massed" version of an intensive course in emergency medicine, investigating a very short spacing interval.

Authors:  Jan Breckwoldt; Jan R Ludwig; Joachim Plener; Torsten Schröder; Hans Gruber; Harm Peters
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.