Comparison of commercial ELISA test kits from Australia and the USA with the serum neutralization test in cell cultures for the detection of antibodies to the infectious laryngotracheitis virus of chickens.

The objective of this work was the evaluation under our conditions of two commercial ELISA kits for the detection of antibodies to avian infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT) virus, one from Australia (Trop-ELISA, TropBio) and one from the USA (ProFLOK-ELISA, KPL), and to compare their performance with the conventional serum neutralization test (SNT) in chick embryo liver cells. Repeatability varied considerably, particularly when using the Trop-ELISA. Therefore, if individual results are important, at least two parallel measurements per serum sample are recommended. In 89.3% of the sera tested by SNT, results of two parallel measurements did not vary by more than one 2-fold dilution step. There was good linear correlation between both ELISAs and the SNT, the correlation coefficient for the Trop-ELISA being r = 0.758 and for the ProFLOK-ELISA r = 0.867. The negative/positive cut-off was redefined to suit our conditions. Sera with a SN titre of > or = 1:4 were considered positive. Sera with < or = 15% absorption in the ProFLOK-ELISA were considered clearly negative. For the Trop-ELISA, extinctions of > or = 0.477 were considered positive, < or = 0.168 clearly negative. Values in between were regarded as doubtful for young chickens and as possibly due to non-specific reactions in older chickens. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISAs relative to the SNT were 87 and 77% for the Trop-ELISA, and 95 and 60%, respectively, for the ProFLOK-ELISA. However, the results indicate that the sensitivity of the ELISA is higher than that of the SNT, because most sera showed similar deviations from SNT results with both ELISAs. Generally, both ELISAs were a suitable alternative to the SNT under our conditions, as long as only negative/positive results are required.