OBJECTIVE: To determine whether emergency medical services (EMS) personnel can use selective diversion and accurately predict those patients being transported who are unlikely to need a critical care bed and those patients unlikely to require admission to the hospital. METHODS: This was a prospective study of patients being transported by the local EMS service. The EMS providers were asked to predict disposition of the patient. Emergency department (ED) personnel were asked to indicate on the study sheet the actual disposition of the patient. RESULTS: A total of 411 patient transports were entered into the study. The EMS providers predicted that 246 (59.9%) would be discharged to home, 96 (23.3%) would be admitted to a floor bed, and 69 (16.8%) would be admitted to a critical care bed (CCB). The actual dispositions of the patients were: 253 (61.6%) discharged to home, 99 (24.1%) admitted to a floor bed, and 59 (9.9%) admitted to a CCB. The EMS providers performed well at predicting those patients who would not need a CCB: negative predictive value 96.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]) (93.4-97.9). They also correctly identified most patients who were discharged to home: 209 of 253, 85% (95% CI is equal to 79.7-89.1%). CONCLUSIONS: EMS providers appear to be capable of using selective diversion categories. EMS providers correctly identified most patients who will not require a critical care bed. The EMS providers also correctly identified most patients who will be discharged from the ED after treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether emergency medical services (EMS) personnel can use selective diversion and accurately predict those patients being transported who are unlikely to need a critical care bed and those patients unlikely to require admission to the hospital. METHODS: This was a prospective study of patients being transported by the local EMS service. The EMS providers were asked to predict disposition of the patient. Emergency department (ED) personnel were asked to indicate on the study sheet the actual disposition of the patient. RESULTS: A total of 411 patient transports were entered into the study. The EMS providers predicted that 246 (59.9%) would be discharged to home, 96 (23.3%) would be admitted to a floor bed, and 69 (16.8%) would be admitted to a critical care bed (CCB). The actual dispositions of the patients were: 253 (61.6%) discharged to home, 99 (24.1%) admitted to a floor bed, and 59 (9.9%) admitted to a CCB. The EMS providers performed well at predicting those patients who would not need a CCB: negative predictive value 96.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]) (93.4-97.9). They also correctly identified most patients who were discharged to home: 209 of 253, 85% (95% CI is equal to 79.7-89.1%). CONCLUSIONS: EMS providers appear to be capable of using selective diversion categories. EMS providers correctly identified most patients who will not require a critical care bed. The EMS providers also correctly identified most patients who will be discharged from the ED after treatment.
Authors: Erin B Wasserman; Manish N Shah; Courtney M C Jones; Jeremy T Cushman; Jeffrey M Caterino; Jeffrey J Bazarian; Suzanne M Gillespie; Julius D Cheng; Ann Dozier Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Christopher W Seymour; Jeremy M Kahn; Colin R Cooke; Timothy R Watkins; Susan R Heckbert; Thomas D Rea Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-08-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Yuval Barak-Corren; Isha Agarwal; Kenneth A Michelson; Todd W Lyons; Mark I Neuman; Susan C Lipsett; Amir A Kimia; Matthew A Eisenberg; Andrew J Capraro; Jason A Levy; Joel D Hudgins; Ben Y Reis; Andrew M Fine Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 4.497