Literature DB >> 16147460

Older adults use mental representations that reduce cognitive load: mental rotation utilizes holistic representations and processing.

Itiel E Dror1, Ina C Schmitz-Williams, Wendy Smith.   

Abstract

Thirty-two participants (16 younger adults, mean age of 18, and 16 older adults, mean age of 70) were examined to determine whether older adults adopt mental representations and processes that are less taxing on the cognitive system. Specifically, they were asked to mentally rotate a variety of images with different levels of complexity to examine whether they mentally rotate stimuli holistically or piecemeal; that is, whether they rotate the image as a single undifferentiated unit or as a collection of segments that are connected together to form the image. Using analysis of variance (ANOVA) the authors observed that younger adults found the more complex images harder to rotate, whereas the older adults rotated the complex images with the same effort as the simple images. The data reflected that older adults used holistic representations and processing in visual mental rotation. This information-processing schema reduces the use of cognitive resources as its underpinning because it is less computationally intensive. Furthermore, such a schema is more robust because it is not dependant or affected by the complexity of the image. The younger adults used piecemeal representations and processing. In contrast to the holistic strategy, the piecemeal schema is more volatile because it entails that the demands on the cognitive system vary with different images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16147460     DOI: 10.1080/03610730500206725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Aging Res        ISSN: 0361-073X            Impact factor:   1.645


  15 in total

1.  Imagery Interference Diminishes in Older Adults: Age-Related Differences in the Magnitude of the Perky Effect.

Authors:  Catherine Craver-Lemley; Robert F Bornstein; Danielle N Alexander; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Imagin Cogn Pers       Date:  2009

2.  Age-related changes in matching novel objects across viewpoints.

Authors:  Karin S Pilz; Yaroslav Konar; Quoc C Vuong; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Age-related effects on spatial memory across viewpoint changes relative to different reference frames.

Authors:  Maria Montefinese; Valentina Sulpizio; Gaspare Galati; Giorgia Committeri
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-19

4.  Different strategies for auditory word recognition in healthy versus normal aging.

Authors:  C J Aine; J E Bryant; J E Knoefel; J C Adair; B Hart; C H Donahue; R Montaño; R Hayek; C Qualls; D Ranken; J M Stephen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Broca's area supports enhanced visuospatial cognition in orchestral musicians.

Authors:  Vanessa Sluming; Jonathan Brooks; Matthew Howard; John Joseph Downes; Neil Roberts
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Selectivity of Face Perception to Horizontal Information over Lifespan (from 6 to 74 Year Old).

Authors:  Valérie Goffaux; Aude Poncin; Christine Schiltz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Holistic face perception in young and older adults: effects of feedback and attentional demand.

Authors:  Bozana Meinhardt-Injac; Malte Persike; Günter Meinhardt
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Mental rotation of faces in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Cassandra A Adduri; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reading as functional coordination: not recycling but a novel synthesis.

Authors:  Thomas Lachmann; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-26

10.  Age-related differences in multiple task monitoring.

Authors:  Ivo Todorov; Fabio Del Missier; Timo Mäntylä
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.