Literature DB >> 16145844

Clinical, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluation of mineralized solvent-dehydrated bone allograf (Puros) in human maxillary sinus grafts.

Sammy S Noumbissi1, Jaime L Lozada, Philip J Boyne, Michael D Rohrer, Donald Clem, Jay S Kim, Hari Prasad.   

Abstract

Demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts (DFDBA) have been successfully used alone or in composite grafts for many decades. Little research has been done on the effect of retaining the mineral content of bone allografts. This study histologically and histomorphometrically evaluated a new mineralized bone allograft material placed in human atrophic maxillary sinuses. Seven partially edentulous patients requiring sinus grafts before implant placement were selected for this study Their age range was 56 to 81 years (mean 67.7 years). Test grafts consisted of a mineralized solvent-dehydrated cancellous bone allograft, and control grafts were a composite of DFDBA and deproteinized bovine bone xenograft (1:1). Bilateral cases (n = 3) received both test and control grafts on opposite sides, and unilateral cases received either a test (n = 3) or control (n = 1) graft only. At 10 months, core biopsies were taken from each graft site, and dental implants were placed into the augmented bone. All bone grafts resulted in new bone formation and all implants osseointegrated. Test grafts resorbed and were replaced by newly formed bone significantly faster and in greater quantities than were control grafts. No complications with grafts or implants were noted. Both test and control grafts achieved excellent results. The faster bone formation observed with the test graft may be due, in part, to its smaller particle size compared with the bovine portion of the control graft. Test grafts were either replaced by new bone or displayed new bone-to-particle surface contact in higher percentages than did control grafts. No differences in osseointegration or graft stability were noted 2 years after the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16145844     DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2005)31[171:CHAHEO]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  10 in total

1.  Horizontal and vertical reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxillary jaw using subantral augmentation and a novel tenting technique with bone from the lateral buccal wall.

Authors:  Antoine Berberi; Nabih Nader; Ziad Noujeim; Alessandro Scardina; Angelo Leone; Ziad Salameh
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-06-28

Review 2.  Effortless effort in bone regeneration: a review.

Authors:  Girish Nazirkar; Shailendra Singh; Vinaykumar Dole; Akhilesh Nikam
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-06-26

3.  Effects of two types of anorganic bovine bone on bone regeneration: a histological and histomorphometric study of rabbit calvaria.

Authors:  Mojgan Paknejad; Amir Reza Rokn; Siamak Yaghobee; Pantea Moradinejad; Mohadeseh Heidari; Ali Mehrfard
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-11-30

4.  A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: A clinical trial.

Authors:  Babak Amoian; Ehsan Moudi; Maryam Seyed Majidi; S M Ali Tabatabaei
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2016-09

5.  Decompression and Enucleation of a Mandibular Radicular Cyst, Followed by Bone Regeneration and Implant-Supported Dental Restoration.

Authors:  M AboulHosn; Z Noujeim; N Nader; A Berberi
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2019-01-09

6.  Histological and immunohistochemical comparison of two different allogeneic bone grafting materials for alveolar ridge reconstruction: A prospective randomized trial in humans.

Authors:  Önder Solakoglu; Werner Götz; Guido Heydecke; Heidi Schwarzenbach
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.932

7.  Comparison of Bone Regeneration between Porcine-Derived and Bovine-Derived Xenografts in Rat Calvarial Defects: A Non-Inferiority Study.

Authors:  Eun-Bin Bae; Ha-Jin Kim; Jong-Ju Ahn; Hyun-Young Bae; Hyung-Joon Kim; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Analyses of Bone Regeneration Capacity of Freeze-Dried Bovine Bone and Combined Deproteinized-Demineralized Bovine Bone Particles in Mandibular Defects: The Potential Application of Biological Forms of Bovine-Bone Filler.

Authors:  David Buntoro Kamadjaja; Handhito Satriyo; Aris Setyawan; Yeni Dian Lesmaya; Jefry Wahyudi Safril; Ni Putu Mira Sumarta; Andra Rizqiawan; Coen Pramono Danudiningrat; Ta To Tran
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-11-23

9.  Esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions in augmented bone: comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone block grafting with the pink esthetic score (PES).

Authors:  Markus Schlee; Jan-Friedrich Dehner; Katja Baukloh; Arndt Happe; Oliver Seitz; Robert Sader
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Comparative Histological and Histomorphometric Results of Six Biomaterials Used in Two-Stage Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Model after 6-Month Healing.

Authors:  Gerardo La Monaca; Giovanna Iezzi; Maria Paola Cristalli; Nicola Pranno; Gian Luca Sfasciotti; Iole Vozza
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.