Literature DB >> 16144214

Interatrial block: pandemic prevalence concealed by anachronistic electrocardiographic standards.

Mary E Frisella1, Michelle M Robinette, David H Spodick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interatrial block (IAB; P waves 2 > or =110 ms duration) has been reported in over 40% of unselected patients in sinus rhythm at widely separated general hospitals. It is thus of "pandemic" proportions. It should be better appreciated because it represents a large, baggy, poorly functional left atrium and is a forerunner of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and other arrhythmias. HYPOTHESIS: A search of all 12 leads will disclose the true prevalence of IAB in contrast to traditional reliance on lead II, as widely proposed in textbooks and other literature.
METHODS: In all, 500 consecutive unselected electrocardiograms (ECGs) were investigated using every lead and a magnifying graticule. For greater specificity, a minimal P duration of > or =120 ms was selected.
RESULTS: Thirty-one ECGs were discarded because of atrial arrhythmia, poor baseline, or undetectable P waves, leaving a base of 469 ECGs, the denominator for the results. A total of 182 patients had IAB, representing 38.8% of this series. The widest P wave was usually found in multiple leads (95.1% of patients). The widest P waves were found only in precordial leads in 59 patients and only in limb leads in 18 patients. "Traditional" lead II detected only 97 cases (53.3%), and IAB was found more frequently in leads V3 and V4.
CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm the pandemic frequency of IAB in one-third of hospitalized patients. Interpreters of ECGs should seek IAB in all 12 leads since reliance on lead II alone resulted in only 53.3% of the total cases. Its prevalence and serious implications with regard to patients' current and future status make this necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16144214      PMCID: PMC6654708          DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960280807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  14 in total

Review 1.  A clinical appraisal of left atrial function.

Authors:  C Stefanadis; J Dernellis; P Toutouzas
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Prevalence of interatrial block in a general hospital population.

Authors:  Navaid Asad; David H Spodick
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Association of interatrial block with development of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Yogesh K Agarwal; Wilbert S Aronow; James A Levy; David H Spodick
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Effect of interatrial block on coronary sinus contraction.

Authors:  Husam H Farah; David H Spodick
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Electrocardiographic findings in 67,375 asymptomatic subjects. X. Normal values.

Authors:  R G HISS; L E LAMB; M F ALLEN
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 6.  Unappreciated prevalence of interatrial block and associated consequences: a poorly perceived pandemic.

Authors:  David H Spodick
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of the resting electrocardiogram in detection and estimation of left atrial enlargement: an echocardiographic correlation in 551 patients.

Authors:  M S Hazen; T H Marwick; D A Underwood
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Electromechanical dysfunction of the left atrium associated with interatrial block.

Authors:  S B Goyal; D H Spodick
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Clinical prediction rule for atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  David Amar; Weiji Shi; Charles W Hogue; Hao Zhang; Rod S Passman; Betsy Thomas; Peter B Bach; Ralph Damiano; Howard T Thaler
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Left atrial enlargement. Echocardiographic assessment of electrocardiographic criteria.

Authors:  A D Waggoner; A V Adyanthaya; M A Quinones; J K Alexander
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prevalence of interatrial block in a general population of elderly people.

Authors:  Ilias Ninios; Christodoulos Pliakos; Vlasios Ninios; Haralampos Karvounis; George Louridas
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Prevalence and incidence of interatrial block in global population and in different clinical situations.

Authors:  Manuel Martínez-Sellés
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.327

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.