Literature DB >> 16143496

An anatomic coordinate system of the femoral neck for highly reproducible BMD measurements using 3D QCT.

Yan Kang1, Klaus Engelke, Christina Fuchs, Willi A Kalender.   

Abstract

In this paper, a procedure for the determination of an anatomically oriented coordinate system of the femoral neck (NCS) in 3D spiral CT datasets is described. The origin of the NCS is centered in the minimal cross-sectional area of the neck. Its three axes are defined as follows: the so called neck axis is perpendicular to this area and points towards the femoral head, the second axis is the principal axis of the minimal cross-sectional area and the third axis is perpendicular to the other two. After a semi-automatic 3D segmentation of the proximal femur the NCS is automatically determined in a two-step minimization procedure. Relative to the coordinate system volumes of interest (VOIs) are positioned in which bone mineral density (BMD) and cortical thickness are analyzed. We investigated intra- and inter-operator precision of the position of the NCS, the BMD in cortical and trabecular VOIs, and cortical thickness in nine pelvic CT datasets obtained from clinical routine examinations. We further investigated the effect of increased noise by adding Gaussian distributed noise to measured projections before tomographic reconstruction. The mean precision error (averaged form the results of the nine datasets) of the NCS position was less than 0.5 mm and smaller than 2.25 degrees . There were no significant differences between inter- and intra-operator analyses. Precision errors in trabecular BMD were smaller than 3% in a stack of five 1 mm thin slices cut perpendicularly to the neck axis and smaller than 1% in a spherical VOI encompassing the neck. Relative precision errors for cortical BMD were smaller than 3% for both VOIs. An increase of noise up to a factor of 5 caused a maximal displacement of the NCS origin position by less than 1mm and a rotation by less than 2 degrees .

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16143496     DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2005.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph        ISSN: 0895-6111            Impact factor:   4.790


  17 in total

1.  Automatic multi-parametric quantification of the proximal femur with quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Serena Bonaretti; Isra Saeed; Roy Harnish; Robert Recker; Andrew J Burghardt; Joyce H Keyak; Tamara Harris; Sundeep Khosla; Thomas F Lang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-08

Review 2.  Bone geometry and skeletal fragility.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; David Karasik
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 3.  New advances in imaging osteoporosis and its complications.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  A local reference frame for describing the proximal human femur: application in clinical settings.

Authors:  Milad Masjedi; Charison Tay; Simon J Harris; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Tarsal and metatarsal bone mineral density measurement using volumetric quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Paul K Commean; Tao Ju; Lu Liu; David R Sinacore; Mary K Hastings; Michael J Mueller
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Densitometric and geometric measurement of the proximal femur in elderly women with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures by volumetric quantitative multi-slice CT.

Authors:  Sheng-yong Wu; Ji Qi; Ying Lu; Jing Lan; Jin-chao Yu; Lian-qing Wen; Zhuo-li Zhang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 7.  New imaging modalities in bone.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.592

8.  Femoral bone strength and its relation to cortical and trabecular changes after treatment with PTH, alendronate, and their combination as assessed by finite element analysis of quantitative CT scans.

Authors:  Tony M Keaveny; Paul F Hoffmann; Mandeep Singh; Lisa Palermo; John P Bilezikian; Susan L Greenspan; Dennis M Black
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone.

Authors:  V Bousson; A Le Bras; F Roqueplan; Y Kang; D Mitton; S Kolta; C Bergot; W Skalli; E Vicaut; W Kalender; K Engelke; J-D Laredo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  QCT of the proximal femur--which parameters should be measured to discriminate hip fracture?

Authors:  O Museyko; V Bousson; J Adams; J -D Laredo; K Engelke
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.