OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to verify the usefulness of NT-proBNP in the differential diagnosis of dyspnea in a population of patients presenting in the ER with breathlessness. DESIGN AND METHODS: In samples from 122 patients presenting in the ER with acute-severe dyspnea and from 25 subjects enrolled as a "comparison group" (NORM), NT-proBNP levels were measured. Patients have been classified on the basis of discharge diagnosis: pulmonary disease (PD, n = 23), pulmonary concomitant to cardiac disease (MIXED, n = 17), pulmonary embolism (EMB, n = 8), cardiac disease (CARD, n = 56), acute myocardial infarction (AMI, n = 11) and other disease (OTHER, n = 7). RESULTS: A significant difference in NT-proBNP values (P <or= 0.05) was found in CARD vs. PD as well as vs. NORM and OTHER groups. 1760 ng/L was the best cut-off value calculated from ROC analysis (AUC +/- SE 0.815 +/- 0.041). Comparing NT-proBNP values and ER diagnosis, a disagreement in 24 patients was observed. Using the discharge diagnosis as the "gold standard," four cases (17%) were found to be FP and 11 cases (46%) were FN according to ER diagnosis, while 2 patients showed false positive and 7 false negative NT-proBNP values. CONCLUSIONS: NT-proBNP measurement represents a useful biochemical tool helping the ER physician in the rapid and reliable recognition of cardiac involvement in patients presenting in the ER with acute-severe dyspnea.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to verify the usefulness of NT-proBNP in the differential diagnosis of dyspnea in a population of patients presenting in the ER with breathlessness. DESIGN AND METHODS: In samples from 122 patients presenting in the ER with acute-severe dyspnea and from 25 subjects enrolled as a "comparison group" (NORM), NT-proBNP levels were measured. Patients have been classified on the basis of discharge diagnosis: pulmonary disease (PD, n = 23), pulmonary concomitant to cardiac disease (MIXED, n = 17), pulmonary embolism (EMB, n = 8), cardiac disease (CARD, n = 56), acute myocardial infarction (AMI, n = 11) and other disease (OTHER, n = 7). RESULTS: A significant difference in NT-proBNP values (P <or= 0.05) was found in CARD vs. PD as well as vs. NORM and OTHER groups. 1760 ng/L was the best cut-off value calculated from ROC analysis (AUC +/- SE 0.815 +/- 0.041). Comparing NT-proBNP values and ER diagnosis, a disagreement in 24 patients was observed. Using the discharge diagnosis as the "gold standard," four cases (17%) were found to be FP and 11 cases (46%) were FN according to ER diagnosis, while 2 patients showed false positive and 7 false negative NT-proBNP values. CONCLUSIONS: NT-proBNP measurement represents a useful biochemical tool helping the ER physician in the rapid and reliable recognition of cardiac involvement in patients presenting in the ER with acute-severe dyspnea.
Authors: Stephen A Hill; Ronald A Booth; P Lina Santaguida; Andrew Don-Wauchope; Judy A Brown; Mark Oremus; Usman Ali; Amy Bustamam; Nazmul Sohel; Robert McKelvie; Cynthia Balion; Parminder Raina Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: Emmert Roberts; Andrew J Ludman; Katharina Dworzynski; Abdallah Al-Mohammad; Martin R Cowie; John J V McMurray; Jonathan Mant Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-03-04