Literature DB >> 16142368

Inter- and intra-individual variability in transdermal fentanyl absorption in cancer pain patients.

Isabelle Solassol1, Laetitia Caumette, Françoise Bressolle, Frédéric Garcia, Simon Thézenas, Cécile Astre, Stéphane Culine, Rémi Coulouma, Frédéric Pinguet.   

Abstract

A transdermal therapeutic system (TTS) is recommended for use in chronic cancer pain, particularly in the advanced stages. The aim of this trial was to study intra- and interindividual variabilities in fentanyl transdermal absorption and investigate physiological and clinical parameters that can influence the absorption in patients treated using a TTS for moderate to severe cancer pain. The study group consisted of 108 patients (71 men and 37 women; mean age, 61.3 years) with chronic cancer pain. A total of 507 patches were analysed. The TTSs used to administer fentanyl were removed after a 72-h period. The amount of fentanyl remaining in the patches was determined using a high-performance liquid chromatography method with ultraviolet detection. Depending on the analgesic requirements of the patient, the dose of fentanyl administered by TTS ranged from 25 to 500 microg/h. The study period was 6 months. Large interindividual variability in the amount of remaining fentanyl in the patches occurred. For 58.1% of patches, absorption was 60 to 84%; for 33.2% of them, it was lower; and for 8.8%, it was higher than this range. The intra-individual variability ranged from 2.8 to 75.1%. The bioavailability of fentanyl was statistically different according to patient age. Patients >75 years of age absorbed 50% of the fentanyl during the selected 72-h period, whereas patients <65 years absorbed 66%. Moreover, there is a significant difference in the percentage of absorbed fentanyl according to the type of cancer. The absorption was higher in patients with breast or digestive cancer than in those with lung cancer. Hyperhidrosis, hypertrichosis and the localization of patches on the skin did not influence bioavailability. For the entire group, transdermal fentanyl treatment provided good to excellent pain relief in the majority of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16142368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1021-335X            Impact factor:   3.906


  8 in total

Review 1.  Fentanyl Formulations in the Management of Pain: An Update.

Authors:  Stephan A Schug; Sonya Ting
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  A review of factors explaining variability in fentanyl pharmacokinetics; focus on implications for cancer patients.

Authors:  Evelien J M Kuip; Maarten L Zandvliet; Stijn L W Koolen; Ron H J Mathijssen; Carin C D van der Rijt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetics of non-intravenous formulations of fentanyl.

Authors:  Jörn Lötsch; Carmen Walter; Michael J Parnham; Bruno G Oertel; Gerd Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Effects of smoking and body mass index on the exposure of fentanyl in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Evelien J M Kuip; Wendy H Oldenmenger; Martine F Thijs-Visser; Peter de Bruijn; Astrid W Oosten; Esther Oomen-de Hoop; Stijn L W Koolen; Carin C D Van der Rijt; Ron H J Mathijssen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does transdermal fentanyl work in patients with low BMI? Patient-reported outcomes of pain and percent pain relief in cancer patients on transdermal fentanyl.

Authors:  Natalie Moryl; Ali Bokhari; Yvona Griffo; Rachel Hadler; Lauren Koranteng; Alexandra Filkins; Tianyu Zheng; Susan D Horn; Charles E Inturrisi
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Compared With Morphine among Adult Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Astère Manirakiza; Laurent Irakoze; Sébastien Manirakiza; Prudence Bizimana
Journal:  East Afr Health Res J       Date:  2020-06-26

7.  Influence of aprepitant and localization of the patch on fentanyl exposure in patients with cancer using transdermal fentanyl.

Authors:  Evelien J M Kuip; Wendy H Oldenmenger; Martine F Visser-Thijs; Peter de Bruijn; Esther Oomen-de Hoop; Ron H J Mathijssen; Carin C D Van der Rijt; Stijn W Koolen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-06

8.  Safety, Tolerability, and Dose Proportionality of a Novel Transdermal Fentanyl Matrix Patch and Bioequivalence With a Matrix Fentanyl Patch: Two Phase 1 Single-Center Open-Label, Randomized Crossover Studies in Healthy Japanese Volunteers.

Authors:  Ulrike Lorch; Tomasz Pierscionek; Anne Freier; Christopher S Spencer; Jörg Täubel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev       Date:  2020-08-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.