Literature DB >> 16142235

Genomic alterations in cultured human embryonic stem cells.

Anirban Maitra1, Dan E Arking, Narayan Shivapurkar, Morna Ikeda, Victor Stastny, Keyaunoosh Kassauei, Guoping Sui, David J Cutler, Ying Liu, Sandii N Brimble, Karin Noaksson, Johan Hyllner, Thomas C Schulz, Xianmin Zeng, William J Freed, Jeremy Crook, Suman Abraham, Alan Colman, Peter Sartipy, Sei-Ichi Matsui, Melissa Carpenter, Adi F Gazdar, Mahendra Rao, Aravinda Chakravarti.   

Abstract

Cultured human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines are an invaluable resource because they provide a uniform and stable genetic system for functional analyses and therapeutic applications. Nevertheless, these dividing cells, like other cells, probably undergo spontaneous mutation at a rate of 10(-9) per nucleotide. Because each mutant has only a few progeny, the overall biological properties of the cell culture are not altered unless a mutation provides a survival or growth advantage. Clonal evolution that leads to emergence of a dominant mutant genotype may potentially affect cellular phenotype as well. We assessed the genomic fidelity of paired early- and late-passage hESC lines in the course of tissue culture. Relative to early-passage lines, eight of nine late-passage hESC lines had one or more genomic alterations commonly observed in human cancers, including aberrations in copy number (45%), mitochondrial DNA sequence (22%) and gene promoter methylation (90%), although the latter was essentially restricted to 2 of 14 promoters examined. The observation that hESC lines maintained in vitro develop genetic and epigenetic alterations implies that periodic monitoring of these lines will be required before they are used in in vivo applications and that some late-passage hESC lines may be unusable for therapeutic purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16142235     DOI: 10.1038/ng1631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  198 in total

1.  The human embryonic stem cell proteome revealed by multidimensional fractionation followed by tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Peng Zhao; Thomas C Schulz; Eric S Sherrer; D Brent Weatherly; Allan J Robins; Lance Wells
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 2.  Induced pluripotent stem cells--opportunities for disease modelling and drug discovery.

Authors:  Marica Grskovic; Ashkan Javaherian; Berta Strulovici; George Q Daley
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Clonal neural stem cells from human embryonic stem cell colonies.

Authors:  Radha Chaddah; Margot Arntfield; Susan Runciman; Laura Clarke; Derek van der Kooy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Quality of Cell Products: Authenticity, Identity, Genomic Stability and Status of Differentiation.

Authors:  Kurt E J Dittmar; Meike Simann; Nadia Zghoul; Oliver Schön; Wilhelm Meyring; Horst Hannig; Lars Macke; Wilhelm G Dirks; Konstantin Miller; Henk S P Garritsen; Werner Lindenmaier
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  High-resolution DNA analysis of human embryonic stem cell lines reveals culture-induced copy number changes and loss of heterozygosity.

Authors:  Elisa Närvä; Reija Autio; Nelly Rahkonen; Lingjia Kong; Neil Harrison; Danny Kitsberg; Lodovica Borghese; Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor; Omid Rasool; Petr Dvorak; Outi Hovatta; Timo Otonkoski; Timo Tuuri; Wei Cui; Oliver Brüstle; Duncan Baker; Edna Maltby; Harry D Moore; Nissim Benvenisty; Peter W Andrews; Olli Yli-Harja; Riitta Lahesmaa
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Differences between karyotypically normal and abnormal human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  S Yang; G Lin; Y-Q Tan; L-Y Deng; D Yuan; G-X Lu
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.831

7.  Genetic and epigenetic X-chromosome variations in a parthenogenetic human embryonic stem cell line.

Authors:  Weiqiang Liu; Yifei Yin; Yonghua Jiang; Chaohui Kou; Yumei Luo; Shengchang Huang; Yuhong Zheng; Shaoying Li; Qing Li; Liyuan Guo; Shaorong Gao; Xiaofang Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Pluripotent stem cell heterogeneity and the evolving role of proteomic technologies in stem cell biology.

Authors:  Rebekah L Gundry; Paul W Burridge; Kenneth R Boheler
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.984

9.  Physiological levels of reactive oxygen species are required to maintain genomic stability in stem cells.

Authors:  Tao-Sheng Li; Eduardo Marbán
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.277

10.  Sustained in vitro trigger of self-renewal divisions in Hoxb4hiPbx1(10) hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Sonia Cellot; Jana Krosl; Jalila Chagraoui; Sylvain Meloche; R Keith Humphries; Guy Sauvageau
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.