Literature DB >> 1614109

[Short and long-term advantages and disadvantages of prolene monofilament sutures in penetrating keratoplasty].

R Faggioni1, C de Courten.   

Abstract

The authors have studied the short and long-term advantages and inconveniences of Prolene monofilament sutures employed in perforating keratoplastic surgery. Contrary to Nylon, Prolene has the advantage of no structural or tensional modifications, postoperative measurements of corneal astigmatism thus remaining more stable with the time. Accordingly, where very little or no astigmatism is noted, the slight or no change in corneal refraction with time is an obvious advantage ot the patient. However, the use of Prolene in the beginning can cause some problems with continuous suture tension, either excessive or insufficient, which can result in serious complications. With training, these difficulties can be overcome and excellent results obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1614109     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1045774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd        ISSN: 0023-2165            Impact factor:   0.700


  2 in total

1.  Prolene monofilament suture in Boston Keratoprosthesis surgery.

Authors:  Ralph Kyrillos; Mona Harissi-Dagher
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-27

Review 2.  Update on Suture Techniques in Corneal Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Luca Pagano; Haider Shah; Omar Al Ibrahim; Kunal A Gadhvi; Giulia Coco; Jason W Lee; Stephen B Kaye; Hannah J Levis; Kevin J Hamill; Francesco Semeraro; Vito Romano
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.