Literature DB >> 16140712

A clinical decision rule to identify children at low risk for appendicitis.

Anupam B Kharbanda1, George A Taylor, Steven J Fishman, Richard G Bachur.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography (CT) has gained widespread acceptance in the evaluation of children with suspected appendicitis. Concern has been raised regarding the long-term effects of ionizing radiation. Other means of diagnosing appendicitis, such as clinical scores, are lacking in children. We sought to develop a clinical decision rule to predict which children with acute abdominal pain do not have appendicitis.
METHODS: Prospective cohort study was conducted of children and adolescents who aged 3 to 18 years, had signs and symptoms suspicious for appendicitis, and presented to the emergency department between April 2003 and July 2004. Standardized data-collection forms were completed on eligible patients. Two low-risk clinical decision rules were created and validated using logistic regression and recursive partitioning. The sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and negative likelihood ratio of each clinical rule were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 601 patients were enrolled. Using logistic regression, we created a 6-part score that consisted of nausea (2 points), history of focal right lower quadrant pain (2 points), migration of pain (1 point), difficulty walking (1 point), rebound tenderness/pain with percussion (2 points), and absolute neutrophil count of >6.75 x 10(3)/microL (6 points). A score < or =5 had a sensitivity of 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87.5-99.0), NPV of 95.6% (95% CI: 90.8-99.0), and negative likelihood ratio of .102 (95% CI: 0.026-0.405) in the validation set. Using recursive partitioning, a second low-risk decision rule was developed consisting of absolute neutrophil count of <6.75 x 10(3)/microL, absence of nausea, and absence of maximal tenderness in the right lower quadrant. This rule had a sensitivity of 98.1% (95% CI: 90.1-99.9), NPV of 97.5% (95% CI: 86.8-99.9), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.058 (95% CI: 0.008-0.411) in the validation set. Theoretical application of the low-risk rules would have resulted in a 20% reduction in CT.
CONCLUSIONS: Our low-risk decision rules can predict accurately which children are at low risk for appendicitis and could be treated safely with careful observation rather than CT examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16140712     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-0094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  36 in total

1.  Diagnosing appendicitis at different time points in children with right lower quadrant pain: comparison between Pediatric Appendicitis Score and the Alvarado score.

Authors:  Han-Ping Wu; Wen-Chieh Yang; Kang-Hsi Wu; Chan-Yu Chen; Yun-Ching Fu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Comparison of the levels of accuracy of an artificial neural network model and a logistic regression model for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Shinya Sakai; Kuriko Kobayashi; Shin-ichi Toyabe; Nozomu Mandai; Tatsuo Kanda; Kohei Akazawa
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  The appropriate use of CT: quality improvement and clinical decision-making in pediatric emergency medicine.

Authors:  Charles G Macias; Julieanna J Sahouria
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17

4.  Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment: tools to improve the value of emergency care.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Schuur; Christopher W Baugh; Erik P Hess; Joshua A Hilton; Jesse M Pines; Brent R Asplin
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Discriminative accuracy of novel and traditional biomarkers in children with suspected appendicitis adjusted for duration of abdominal pain.

Authors:  Anupam B Kharbanda; Yohaimi Cosme; Khin Liu; Steven L Spitalnik; Peter S Dayan
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Implementation of an Electronic Clinical Decision Support Tool for Pediatric Appendicitis Within a Hospital Network.

Authors:  Marissa A Hendrickson; Andrew R Wey; Philippe R Gaillard; Anupam B Kharbanda
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.454

7.  A Clinical Score to Predict Appendicitis in Older Male Children.

Authors:  Anupam B Kharbanda; Michael C Monuteaux; Richard G Bachur; Nanette C Dudley; Lalit Bajaj; Michelle D Stevenson; Charles G Macias; Manoj K Mittal; Jonathan E Bennett; Kelly Sinclair; Peter S Dayan
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.107

8.  Deciding whether to screen for abusive head trauma: do we need a clinical decision rule?

Authors:  Rachel Berger; Thomas McGinn
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.624

9.  CT utilization: the emergency department perspective.

Authors:  Joshua Seth Broder
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-09-23

10.  Application of histone modification in the risk prediction of the biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Li-Xin Zhou; Tao Li; Yi-Ran Huang; Jian-Jun Sha; Peng Sun; Dong Li
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.