OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of alarm-based combination therapy using desmopressin and imipramine for primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis. METHODS: Of the 105 patients, 37 were treated with alarm monotherapy (monotherapy group), 35 were treated with desmopressin combined with an alarm (desmopressin group), and 33 were treated with imipramine combined with an alarm (imipramine group). The therapeutic effects were evaluated at 3 and 6 months. The relapse rates and predictive factors of the therapies were also studied. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the changes in the frequency of wet nights among the three groups, although the frequencies in all three groups decreased significantly with the therapeutic duration. Although the improvement rates at 3 months did not differ among the three groups, the improvement rate of 80% in the desmopressin group and 79% in the imipramine group at 6 months were greater than the 59% rate in the monotherapy group. After cure, no patients relapsed in the monotherapy group, and 3 (43%) each did so in the desmopressin and imipramine groups. In comparing the improved cases in each group, no significant differences were found in background factors. CONCLUSIONS: Desmopressin and imipramine combined with an alarm was no more effective than alarm monotherapy. As for alarm monotherapy, other therapeutic modalities should be considered if it has not proved effective after 3 months. In such a situation, combination therapy may be effective as a second choice. No predictive factors for the therapeutic effects in the three modalities were found.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of alarm-based combination therapy using desmopressin and imipramine for primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis. METHODS: Of the 105 patients, 37 were treated with alarm monotherapy (monotherapy group), 35 were treated with desmopressin combined with an alarm (desmopressin group), and 33 were treated with imipramine combined with an alarm (imipramine group). The therapeutic effects were evaluated at 3 and 6 months. The relapse rates and predictive factors of the therapies were also studied. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the changes in the frequency of wet nights among the three groups, although the frequencies in all three groups decreased significantly with the therapeutic duration. Although the improvement rates at 3 months did not differ among the three groups, the improvement rate of 80% in the desmopressin group and 79% in the imipramine group at 6 months were greater than the 59% rate in the monotherapy group. After cure, no patients relapsed in the monotherapy group, and 3 (43%) each did so in the desmopressin and imipramine groups. In comparing the improved cases in each group, no significant differences were found in background factors. CONCLUSIONS: Desmopressin and imipramine combined with an alarm was no more effective than alarm monotherapy. As for alarm monotherapy, other therapeutic modalities should be considered if it has not proved effective after 3 months. In such a situation, combination therapy may be effective as a second choice. No predictive factors for the therapeutic effects in the three modalities were found.