Literature DB >> 16139869

Variability of total exposure to PM2.5 related to indoor and outdoor pollution sources Krakow study in pregnant women.

Wieslaw A Jedrychowski1, Frederica P Perera, Agnieszka Pac, Ryszard Jacek, Robin M Whyatt, John D Spengler, Thomas S Dumyahn, Elzbieta Sochacka-Tatara.   

Abstract

The study is a part of an ongoing prospective cohort study on the relationship between the exposure to environmental factors during pregnancy and birth outcomes and health of newborns. We have measured personal PM(2.5) level in the group of 407 non-smoking pregnant women during the 2nd trimester of pregnancy. On average, the participants from the city center were exposed to higher exposure than those from the outer city area (GM=42.0 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 36.8-48.0 vs. 35.8 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 33.5-38.2 microg/m(3)). More than 20% of study subjects were affected by high level of PM(2.5) pollution (above 65 microg/m(3)). PM(2.5) concentrations were higher during the heating season (GM=43.4 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 40.1-46.9 microg/m(3)) compared to non-heating season (GM=29.8 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 27.5-32.2 microg/m(3)). Out of all potential outdoor air pollution sources (high traffic density, bus depot, waste incinerator, industry etc.) considered in the bivariate analysis, only the proximity of industrial plant showed significant impact on the personal exposure (GM=54.3 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 39.4-74.8 microg/m(3)) compared with corresponding figure for those who did not declare living near the industrial premises (GM=36.2 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 34.1-38.4 microg/m(3)). The subjects declaring high exposure to ETS (>10 cigarettes daily) have shown very high level of personal exposure (GM=88.8 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 73.9-106.7 microg/m(3)) compared with lower ETS exposure (< or =10 cigarettes) (GM=46.3 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 40.0-53.5 microg/m(3)) and no-ETS exposure group (GM=33.9 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 31.8-36.1 microg/m(3)). The contribution of the background ambient PM(10) level was very strong determinant of the total personal exposure to PM(2.5) and it explained about 31% of variance between the subjects followed by environmental tobacco smoke (10%), home heating by coal/wood stoves (2%), other types of heating (2%) and the industrial plant localization in the proximity of household (1%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16139869     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

1.  Source attribution of personal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mixture using concurrent personal, indoor, and outdoor measurements.

Authors:  Hyunok Choi; John Spengler
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 2.  Recent contributions of air- and biomarkers to the control of secondhand smoke (SHS): a review.

Authors:  Jacques J Prignot
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Maternal exposure to carbon monoxide and fine particulate matter during pregnancy in an urban Tanzanian cohort.

Authors:  B J Wylie; Y Kishashu; E Matechi; Z Zhou; B Coull; A I Abioye; K L Dionisio; F Mugusi; Z Premji; W Fawzi; R Hauser; M Ezzati
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 5.770

4.  International studies of prenatal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fetal growth.

Authors:  Hyunok Choi; Wieslaw Jedrychowski; John Spengler; David E Camann; Robin M Whyatt; Virginia Rauh; Wei-Yann Tsai; Frederica P Perera
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Assessment of Traffic-Related Air Pollution: Case Study of Pregnant Women in South Texas.

Authors:  Mohammad Hashem Askariyeh; Suriya Vallamsundar; Josias Zietsman; Tara Ramani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Estimating individual-level exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons throughout the gestational period based on personal, indoor, and outdoor monitoring.

Authors:  Hyunok Choi; Frederica Perera; Agnieszka Pac; Lu Wang; Elzbieta Flak; Elzbieta Mroz; Ryszard Jacek; Tricia Chai-Onn; Wieslaw Jedrychowski; Elizabeth Masters; David Camann; John Spengler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Intraurban and longitudinal variability of classical pollutants in Kraków, Poland, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Hyunok Choi; Steven Melly; John Spengler
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.