Literature DB >> 16139697

Do traditional techniques produce better conventional complete dentures than simplified techniques?

Yasuhiko Kawai1, Hiroshi Murakami, Batoul Shariati, Esa Klemetti, John V Blomfield, Lucie Billette, James P Lund, Jocelyne S Feine.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the quality of conventional complete dentures fabricated with two different techniques. A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to compare traditional (T) and simplified (S) methods of making complete conventional dentures on patients' ratings of satisfaction, comfort and function at 3 and 6 months following delivery. The quality of the prostheses was rated by prosthodontists at 6 months.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-two male and female edentulous individuals, aged 45-75 years, were randomly allocated into groups that received dentures made with either T or S methods. Following delivery, patients' ratings of several denture-related factors were measured using 100mm visual analogue scales, and denture quality was assessed by blinded prosthodontists using ratings on a validated quantitative scale.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in patient ratings for overall satisfaction (3 months: mean T = 83 mm, mean S = 83 mm, P = 0.97; 6 months: mean T = 79 mm, mean S = 79 mm, P = 0.96) or in prosthodontists' ratings of denture quality (T = 66, S = 63; P = 0.38).
CONCLUSION: These results show that the quality of complete dentures does not suffer when manufacturing techniques are simplified to save time and materials. Dental educators should consider these findings when re-designing prosthodontic training programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16139697     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  15 in total

1.  Influence of a face-bow on oral health-related quality of life after changing the vertical dimension in the articulator: a randomized controlled trial. Part II.

Authors:  Manja von Stein-Lausnitz; Steffen Schmid; Felix H Blankenstein; Ingrid Peroz; Florian Beuer; Guido Sterzenbach
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Hypothetical Model of How a Clinical Remount Procedure Benefits Patients with Existing Dentures: A Narrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Chi-Hsiang Cheng; Ikiru Atsuta; Kiyoshi Koyano; Yasunori Ayukawa
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09

3.  Does a face-bow lead to better occlusion in complete dentures? A randomized controlled trial: part I.

Authors:  Manja von Stein-Lausnitz; Guido Sterzenbach; Iven Helm; Antje Zorn; Felix H Blankenstein; Sebastian Ruge; Bernd Kordaß; Florian Beuer; Ingrid Peroz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Utility versus futility of facebow in the fabrication of complete dentures: A systematic review.

Authors:  Poonam Prakash; Kirandeep Singh; Rahul Bahri; S K Bhandari
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2020-07-17

Review 5.  The elastomers for complete denture impression: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Elie E Daou
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2010-07-17

Review 6.  Final-impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures.

Authors:  Srinivasan Jayaraman; Balendra P Singh; Balasubramanian Ramanathan; Murukan Pazhaniappan Pillai; Laura MacDonald; Richard Kirubakaran
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-04

7.  Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for self-assessment of complete dentures.

Authors:  Yuriko Komagamine; Manabu Kanazawa; Yoshinori Kaiba; Yusuke Sato; Shunsuke Minakuchi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  A randomised controlled trial of complete denture impression materials.

Authors:  T P Hyde; H L Craddock; J C Gray; S H Pavitt; C Hulme; M Godfrey; C Fernandez; N Navarro-Coy; S Dillon; J Wright; S Brown; G Dukanovic; P A Brunton
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Study protocol for a multi-center, randomized controlled trial to develop Japanese denture adhesive guidelines for patients with complete dentures: the Denture Adhesive Guideline trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Suguru Kimoto; Yasuhiko Kawai; Atsuko Gunji; Hisatomo Kondo; Taro Nomura; Tomohiko Murakami; Akito Tsuboi; Guang Hong; Shunsuke Minakuchi; Yusuke Sato; Gaku Ohwada; Tetsuya Suzuki; Katsuhiko Kimoto; Noriyuki Hoshi; Makiko Saita; Yoshikazu Yoneyama; Yohei Sato; Masakazu Morokuma; Joji Okazaki; Takeshi Maeda; Kenichiro Nakai; Tetsuo Ichikawa; Kan Nagao; Keiko Fujimoto; Hiroshi Murata; Tadafumi Kurogi; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Masahiro Nishimura; Yasuhiro Nishi; Mamoru Murakami; Toshio Hosoi; Taizo Hamada
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Learning effects of different training models for border molding from the perspective of dental students.

Authors:  Mai Okubo; Yusuke Sato; Yuki Hirajima; Shunsuke Minakuchi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.