Literature DB >> 16139156

Is regional citrate superior to systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy? A prospective observational study in an adult regional critical care system.

Sean M Bagshaw1, Kevin B Laupland, Paul J E Boiteau, Tomas Godinez-Luna.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is commonly used in the care of critically ill patients although the optimal means of anticoagulation is not well defined. We report our regional CRRT protocol that was developed using the principles of quality improvement and compare the effect of regional citrate with systemic heparin anticoagulation on filter life span.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study in a Canadian adult regional critical care system. A standardized protocol for CRRT has been implemented at all adult intensive care units in the Calgary Health Region since August 1999. All patients with acute renal failure treated with CRRT during October 1, 2002, to September 30, 2003, were identified and followed up prospectively until hospital discharge or death.
RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients with acute renal failure requiring CRRT were identified, 54 were initially treated with citrate, 29 with heparin, and 4 with saline flushes. Citrate and heparin were used in 212 (66%) and 97 (30%) of filters for 8776 and 2651 hours of CRRT, respectively. Overall median (interquartile range) filter life span with citrate was significantly greater than heparin (40 [14-72] vs 20 [5-44] hours, P < .001). The median time to spontaneous filter failure was significantly greater with citrate compared with heparin (>72 vs 33 hours, P < .001). Citrate anticoagulation resulted in greater completion of scheduled filter life span (59% vs 10%, P > .001). Citrate anticoagulation was well tolerated with no patient requiring elective discontinuation for hypernatremia, metabolic alkalosis, or hypocalcemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Regional citrate anticoagulation was associated with prolonged filter survival and increased completion of scheduled filter life span compared with heparin. These data support small studies suggesting that citrate is a superior anticoagulant for CRRT and suggest the need for a future definitive randomized controlled trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16139156     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  27 in total

Review 1.  [Citrate anticoagulation in acute renal replacement therapy : Method of choice].

Authors:  R D Frank
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  Regional anticoagulation with citrate is superior to systemic anticoagulation with heparin in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Joon-Sung Park; Gheun-Ho Kim; Chong Myung Kang; Chang Hwa Lee
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.884

3.  Use of High-Flow Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy with Citrate Anticoagulation to Control Intracranial Pressure by Maintaining Hypernatremia in a Patient with Acute Brain Injury and Renal Failure.

Authors:  Joshua E Medow; Shalin R Sanghvi; R Michael Hofmann
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-12-08

4.  Evaluating the safety and efficacy of regional citrate compared to systemic heparin as anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: A service evaluation following a change in practice.

Authors:  Roberta Borg; Debra Ugboma; Dawn-Marie Walker; Richard Partridge
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2017-03-14

5.  Effect of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation vs Systemic Heparin Anticoagulation During Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy on Dialysis Filter Life Span and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Alexander Zarbock; Mira Küllmar; Detlef Kindgen-Milles; Carola Wempe; Joachim Gerss; Timo Brandenburger; Thomas Dimski; Bartosz Tyczynski; Michael Jahn; Nils Mülling; Martin Mehrländer; Peter Rosenberger; Gernot Marx; Tim Philipp Simon; Ulrich Jaschinski; Philipp Deetjen; Christian Putensen; Jens-Christian Schewe; Stefan Kluge; Dominik Jarczak; Torsten Slowinski; Marc Bodenstein; Patrick Meybohm; Stefan Wirtz; Onnen Moerer; Andreas Kortgen; Philipp Simon; Sean M Bagshaw; John A Kellum; Melanie Meersch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Citrate versus non-citrate anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy: Results following a change in local critical care protocol.

Authors:  Samina R Chowdhury; Tom Lawton; Aaqid Akram; Robert Collin; James Beck
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2016-11-01

7.  Anticoagulation, delivered dose and outcomes in CRRT: The program to improve care in acute renal disease (PICARD).

Authors:  Rolando Claure-Del Granado; Etienne Macedo; Sharon Soroko; YeonWon Kim; Glenn M Chertow; Jonathan Himmelfarb; T Alp Ikizler; Emil P Paganini; Ravindra L Mehta
Journal:  Hemodial Int       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 1.812

Review 8.  Renal replacement therapy: a practical update.

Authors:  George Alvarez; Carla Chrusch; Terry Hulme; Juan G Posadas-Calleja
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 9.  Quality indicators of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) care in critically ill patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Oleksa G Rewa; Pierre-Marc Villeneuve; Philippe Lachance; Dean T Eurich; Henry T Stelfox; R T Noel Gibney; Lisa Hartling; Robin Featherstone; Sean M Bagshaw
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Citrate Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Yin Zheng; Zhongye Xu; Qiuyu Zhu; Junfeng Liu; Jing Qian; Huaizhou You; Yong Gu; Chuanming Hao; Zheng Jiao; Feng Ding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.