Literature DB >> 16137594

The real value of lower esophageal sphincter measurement for predicting acid gastroesophageal reflux or Barrett's esophagus.

Oscar Alonso1, Diego Hernández, Enrique Moreno, Alejandro Manrique, Almudena Moreno, Alvaro García-Sesma, Jorge Calvo.   

Abstract

The study goal was to ascertain the true value of lower esophageal sphincter measurement in order to establish the risk of presenting gastroesophageal reflux or Barrett's esophagus. Of 671 patients assessed for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux, 459 were included in a prospective study, practicing esophagogastroscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour pH-metry. The risks of presenting a pathologic DeMeester score or Barrett's esophagus were estimated according to different values for the lower esophageal sphincter parameters. The risk of a pathologic DeMeester score only increased when pressure was less than 6 mm Hg, total length was less than 2 cm, or abdominal length was less than 1 cm; regardless of which parameter was affected, the risk being greater when the three parameters were altered (odds ratio=2.4, 3.1, and 4 for one, two, and three altered parameters). Male sex, sphincter pressure, and DeMeester score were associated with Barrett's esophagus (P<0.05) but not total or abdominal length. Pressure and total and abdominal lengths have a similar influence over establishing the risk of pathologic acid reflux, but only pressure may indicate the risk of Barrett's esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16137594     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  11 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts of the antireflux barrier.

Authors:  R K Mittal
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 2.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with columnar-lined esophagus.

Authors:  R B Ter; D O Castell
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.806

3.  Toxic bile acids in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: influence of gastric acidity.

Authors:  D Nehra; P Howell; C P Williams; J K Pye; J Beynon
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Specialized columnar epithelium of the esophagogastric junction: prevalence and associations. The Central Finland Endoscopy Study Group.

Authors:  M Voutilainen; M Färkkilä; M Juhola; K Nuorva; K Mauranen; T Mäntynen; I Kunnamo; J P Mecklin; P Sipponen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Functional foregut abnormalities in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  H J Stein; S Hoeft; T R DeMeester
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 6.  Esophageal physiology and pathophysiology.

Authors:  D J Sugarbaker; D J Kearney; W G Richards
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 7.  Biology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: pathophysiology relating to medical and surgical treatment.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; J H Peters; C G Bremner; P Chandrasoma
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 13.739

8.  Bile reflux in benign and malignant Barrett's esophagus: effect of medical acid suppression and nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  H J Stein; W K Kauer; H Feussner; J R Siewert
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Barrett's esophagus control after antireflux surgery.

Authors:  F Ochando Cerdán; D Hernández García-Gallardo; E Moreno González
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Clinical features and endoscopic progression of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  A Garrido Serrano; F J Guerrero Igea; J A Lepe Jiménez; C Perianes Hernández
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.