| Literature DB >> 1613619 |
Abstract
A case is presented of a 32-year-old man with classic clinical adult-onset Still's disease, who had an initially elevated (1:320) but not persistently high rheumatoid factor. Since lack of a high rheumatoid factor is one feature in the proposed classification criteria for adult-onset Still's disease, the patient was given a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. The faulty reasoning behind this diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis is discussed, focusing on the inappropriate use of classification criteria for individual clinical diagnosis, as well as the occasional need for longitudinal diagnosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1992 PMID: 1613619 DOI: 10.1007/bf02598097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gen Intern Med ISSN: 0884-8734 Impact factor: 5.128