Literature DB >> 16135888

Computational analysis in vitro: dynamics and plasticity of a neuro-robotic system.

Amir Karniel1, Michael Kositsky, Karen M Fleming, Michela Chiappalone, Vittorio Sanguineti, Simon T Alford, Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi.   

Abstract

When the brain interacts with the environment it constantly adapts by representing the environment in a form that is called an internal model. The neurobiological basis for internal models is provided by the connectivity and the dynamical properties of neurons. Thus, the interactions between neural tissues and external devices provide a fundamental means for investigating the connectivity and dynamical properties of neural populations. We developed this idea, suggested in the 1980s by Valentino Braitenberg, for investigating and representing the dynamical behavior of neuronal populations in the brainstem of the lamprey. The brainstem was maintained in vitro and connected in a closed loop with two types of artificial device: (a) a simulated dynamical system and (b) a small mobile robot. In both cases, the device was controlled by recorded extracellular signals and its output was translated into electrical stimuli delivered to the neural system. The goal of the first study was to estimate the dynamical dimension of neural preparation in a single-input/single-output configuration. The dynamical dimension is the number of state variables that together with the applied input determine the output of a system. The results indicate that while this neural system has significant dynamical properties, its effective complexity, as established by the dynamical dimension, is rather moderate. In the second study, we considered a more specific situation, in which the same portion of the nervous system controls a robotic device in a two-input/two-output configuration. We fitted the input-output data from the neuro-robotic preparation to neural network models having different internal dynamics and we observed the generalization error of each model. Consistent with the first study, this second experiment showed that a simple recurrent dynamical model was able to capture the behavior of the hybrid system. This experimental and computational framework provides the means for investigating neural plasticity and internal representations in the context of brain-machine interfaces.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16135888     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/2/3/S08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  8 in total

1.  New Perspectives on the Dialogue between Brains and Machines.

Authors:  Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Simon T Alford; Michela Chiappalone; Luciano Fadiga; Amir Karniel; Michael Kositsky; Emma Maggiolini; Stefano Panzeri; Vittorio Sanguineti; Marianna Semprini; Alessandro Vato
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  A generic framework for real-time multi-channel neuronal signal analysis, telemetry control, and sub-millisecond latency feedback generation.

Authors:  Christoph Zrenner; Danny Eytan; Avner Wallach; Peter Thier; Shimon Marom
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 3.  Brain-computer interfaces: a powerful tool for scientific inquiry.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Wander; Rajesh P N Rao
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Closed-loop, open-source electrophysiology.

Authors:  John D Rolston; Robert E Gross; Steve M Potter
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Brain-machine interactions for assessing the dynamics of neural systems.

Authors:  Michael Kositsky; Michela Chiappalone; Simon T Alford; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  MEART: The Semi-Living Artist.

Authors:  Douglas J Bakkum; Philip M Gamblen; Guy Ben-Ary; Zenas C Chao; Steve M Potter
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Shaping embodied neural networks for adaptive goal-directed behavior.

Authors:  Zenas C Chao; Douglas J Bakkum; Steve M Potter
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Connecting neurons to a mobile robot: an in vitro bidirectional neural interface.

Authors:  A Novellino; P D'Angelo; L Cozzi; M Chiappalone; V Sanguineti; S Martinoia
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2007
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.