Literature DB >> 1613561

Euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp and oral glucose load in stimulating myocardial glucose utilization during positron emission tomography.

M J Knuuti1, P Nuutila, U Ruotsalainen, M Saraste, R Härkönen, A Ahonen, M Teräs, M Haaparanta, U Wegelius, A Haapanen.   

Abstract

To enable assessment of myocardial viability, myocardial glucose utilization has commonly been stimulated by oral glucose loading. To compare the effects of glucose loading and insulin and glucose infusion (insulin clamp) on PET fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) myocardial scan image quality and regional myocardial glucose utilization rate (rMGU), eight patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and previous myocardial Q-wave infarction were studied twice, once during insulin clamp and once 1 hr after oral glucose loading. The rMGU rates were derived by graphic Patlak analysis in 33 normal, 10 scar and 6 "hot spot" myocardial segments. Infusion of insulin and glucose gave stable plasma-glucose and serum-insulin levels during imaging. In contrast, glucose loading caused marked changes in plasma-glucose and insulin concentrations. The image quality was clearly superior and the fractional utilization rates of [18F]FDG were twice as high during insulin clamp than after glucose loading (p less than 0.0001). Due to the higher plasma-glucose levels after glucose loading, the calculated rMGU in normal, scar and hot spot myocardial segments was comparable between the two protocols. The insulin clamp technique makes it possible to adjust and maintain a metabolic steady state during the PET study. It does not alter [18F]FDG uptake patterns in different myocardial areas when compared to the standard glucose loading protocol, but this technique results in superior image quality and permits the use of smaller [18F] FDG patient doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1613561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  56 in total

1.  BMIPP compared with PET metabolism.

Authors:  E Tadamura; N Tamaki; T Kudoh; N Hattori; J Konishi
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-02

Review 2.  Tracer kinetic modeling in nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  T R DeGrado; S R Bergmann; C K Ng; D M Raffel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Fluorine-18-deoxyglucose SPECT and coincidence imaging for myocardial viability: Clinical and technologic issues.

Authors:  V Dilsizian; S L Bacharach; M M Khin; M F Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose single-photon emission computed tomography predicts functional outcome of dyssynergic myocardium after surgical revascularization.

Authors:  J J Bax; J H Cornel; F C Visser; P M Fioretti; J M Huitink; A van Lingen; G W Sloof; C A Visser
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Safety and feasibility of cardiac FDG SPECT following oral administration of Acipimox, a nicotinic acid derivative: Comparison of image quality with hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamping in nondiabetic patients.

Authors:  Jeroen J Bax; Frans C Visser; Don Poldermans; Arthur Van Lingen; Abdou Elhendy; Eric Boersma; Gerrit W Sloof; Cees A Visser
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  PET myocardial perfusion and glucose metabolism imaging: Part 2-Guidelines for interpretation and reporting.

Authors:  Heinrich R Schelbert; Robert Beanlands; Frank Bengel; Juhani Knuuti; Marcelo Dicarli; Josef Machac; Randolph Patterson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  B Hesse; K Tägil; A Cuocolo; C Anagnostopoulos; M Bardiés; J Bax; F Bengel; E Busemann Sokole; G Davies; M Dondi; L Edenbrandt; P Franken; A Kjaer; J Knuuti; M Lassmann; M Ljungberg; C Marcassa; P Y Marie; F McKiddie; M O'Connor; E Prvulovich; R Underwood; B van Eck-Smit
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Magnetocardiographic assessment of healed myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Helena Hänninen; Miia Holmström; Paula Vesterinen; Milla Karvonen; Heikki Väänänen; Lasse Oikarinen; Markku Mäkijärvi; Jukka Nenonen; Kirsi Lauerma; Toivo Katila; Lauri Toivonen
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 9.  Imaging the myocardial ischemic cascade.

Authors:  Arthur E Stillman; Matthijs Oudkerk; David A Bluemke; Menko Jan de Boer; Jens Bremerich; Ernest V Garcia; Matthias Gutberlet; Pim van der Harst; W Gregory Hundley; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Dirkjan Kuijpers; Raymond Y Kwong; Eike Nagel; Stamatios Lerakis; John Oshinski; Jean-François Paul; Riemer H J A Slart; Vinod Thourani; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Temporal analysis of the depolarization wave of healed myocardial infarction in body surface potential mapping.

Authors:  Paula Vesterinen; Helena Hänninen; Milla Karvonen; Kirsi Lauerma; Miia Holmström; Markku Mäkijärvi; Heikki Väänänen; Jukka Nenonen; Toivo Katila; Lauri Toivonen
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.