Literature DB >> 16135480

Is prostate-specific antigen a valid surrogate end point for survival in hormonally treated patients with metastatic prostate cancer? Joint research of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, the Limburgs Universitair Centrum, and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals.

Laurence Collette1, Tomasz Burzykowski, Kevin J Carroll, Don Newling, Tom Morris, Fritz H Schröder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The long duration of phase III clinical trials of overall survival (OS) slows down the treatment-development process. It could be shortened by using surrogate end points. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most studied biomarker in prostate cancer (PCa). This study attempts to validate PSA end points as surrogates for OS in advanced PCa. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual data from 2,161 advanced PCa patients treated in studies comparing bicalutamide to castration were used in a meta-analytic approach to surrogate end-point validation. PSA response, PSA normalization, time to PSA progression, and longitudinal PSA measurements were considered.
RESULTS: The known association between PSA and OS at the individual patient level was confirmed. The association between the effect of intervention on any PSA end point and on OS was generally low (determination coefficient, < 0.69).
CONCLUSION: It is a common misconception that high correlation between biomarkers and true end point justify the use of the former as surrogates. To statistically validate surrogate end points, a high correlation between the treatment effects on the surrogate and true end point needs to be established across groups of patients treated with two alternative interventions. The levels of association observed in this study indicate that the effect of hormonal treatment on OS cannot be predicted with a high degree of precision from observed treatment effects on PSA end points, and thus statistical validity is unproven. In practice, non-null treatment effects on OS can be predicted only from precisely estimated large effects on time to PSA progression (TTPP; hazard ratio, < 0.50).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16135480     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  27 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate end points--the challenge of statistical validation.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Daniel J Sargent; Axel Grothey; Alastair Matheson; Aimery de Gramont
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Markers for nutrition studies: review of criteria for the evaluation of markers.

Authors:  Jan de Vries; Jean-Michel Antoine; Tomasz Burzykowski; Alessandro Chiodini; Mike Gibney; Gunter Kuhnle; Agnès Méheust; Loek Pijls; Ian Rowland
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  Prostate cancer: PSA as an intermediate end point in clinical trials.

Authors:  Gerhardt Attard; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  PSA response rate as a surrogate marker for median overall survival in docetaxel-based first-line treatments for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an analysis of 22 trials.

Authors:  Edoardo Francini; Roberto Petrioli; Giulia Rossi; Letizia Laera; Giandomenico Roviello
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-09-07

Review 5.  Predicting response to hormonal therapy and survival in men with hormone sensitive metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Petros D Grivas; Diane M Robins; Maha Hussain
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy: redefining the standard of care?

Authors:  Neal D Shore; E David Crawford
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

7.  Impact of Copula Directional Specification on Multi-Trial Evaluation of Surrogate End Points.

Authors:  Lindsay A Renfro; Hongwei Shang; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.051

8.  Multitrial Evaluation of Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate End Point for Overall Survival in First-Line Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Nathan R Foster; Lindsay A Renfro; Steven E Schild; Mary W Redman; Xiaofei F Wang; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Keyue Ding; Penelope A Bradbury; Suresh S Ramalingam; David R Gandara; Taro Shibata; Nagahiro Saijo; Everett E Vokes; Alex A Adjei; Sumithra J Mandrekar
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  Normalization of prostate specific antigen in patients treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew D Schmitz; Gilbert D A Padula; Patrick Y Chun; Alan T Davis
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  Meta-analysis for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Qian Shi; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.