Literature DB >> 1613520

Knee arthroplasty rating.

R Binazzi1, M Soudry, L A Mestriner, J N Insall.   

Abstract

A number of rating systems used to evaluate the results of total knee arthroplasty exist. Many of these systems are based on different concepts, and might be expected to give divergent results. To see if this was so, the authors examined a consecutive series of 235 posterior stabilized knee arthroplasties recording the results according to five rating systems: HSS (The Hospital for Special Surgery), Brigham, Freeman, BOA (British Orthopaedic Association), and the VENN diagram. In spite of their apparent differences, all point systems and the BOA gave almost identical results, while the VENN diagram proved to be the most stringent. The authors suggest that any of the current point systems may be used to "score" arthroplasties, but the results should also be rated with the VENN diagram in order to see the quality of the arthroplasty and a comparison between the different series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1613520     DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(92)90007-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  1 in total

1.  [Open reduction and internal fixation with plate via posteromedial approach of retaining pes anserinus tendon in the treatment of tibial plateau fracture].

Authors:  Xinlong Zhang; Wentao Ci; Shi Yan; Kaiwen Luo; Shuai Yan; Qingzhu Zhang; Xuelian Yin; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-02-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.